Skip to main content
discipline 4 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Andrew Philip Thomas

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number11486/2016
Date01/01/2016
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Client Money, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
CostsGBP 11,000
Dishonesty foundYes

Andrew Philip Thomas, a sole practitioner, used £20,000 of client interim damages to pay office expenses, transferred success fees from client to office account without delivering bills, failed to keep proper accounting records and failed to carry out client account reconciliations. He admitted all allegations including dishonesty in relation to the £20,000. The Tribunal found dishonesty proved under the Twinsectra test. Allegation 1.3 (falsely creating a bill) was withdrawn. Despite significant mitigation and financial pressures, the Tribunal found no exceptional circumstances and struck him off the Roll, ordering costs of £11,000 not to be enforced without leave.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Dishonesty admitted
  • Deliberate misconduct - took client monies knowing he was not entitled
  • Actions were planned; letter to client misled her
  • Financial chaos and lack of accounts over a period of time
  • Client taken advantage of
  • Only admitted misappropriation after learning of imminent inspection
  • Experienced solicitor aware of obligations

Mitigating factors:

  • No loss to client - funds repaid after five weeks
  • Voluntarily notified regulator via accountant (albeit once inspection imminent)
  • Single episode in otherwise unblemished career
  • No previous disciplinary matters
  • Genuine insight, regret and embarrassment
  • Co-operated with the SRA
  • Firm faced significant financial pressures (legal aid changes, doubled rent, IT crash)

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/11486/