Skip to main content
discipline 3 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Louise Elizabeth Sutherland

JurisdictionScotland
BodyScottish Solicitors' Discipline Tribunal (SSDT)
Professionsolicitor — Louise Elizabeth Sutherland, The Cottage, Murtle Den Road, Milltimber
Date23rd Apr 2018
AppealNo Appeal

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
Dishonesty foundYes

Louise Elizabeth Sutherland, a former partner and cashroom manager at Graeme Murray & Co, Aberdeen, was found guilty of professional misconduct for a dishonest, premeditated course of conduct involving overcharging four clients, rendering 18 unjustified invoices, creating misleading ledger narratives in seven files to mask the firm's financial position, rendering 120 fee notes with no justifying work, and dishonestly putting through fees to use client funds to keep the firm afloat. The Tribunal expressly found dishonesty. Although no client ultimately lost money (all funds were recredited), the Tribunal held this dishonest conduct meant she was not fit to remain in the profession and ordered her name struck off the Roll. The Respondent was found liable for the expenses of the Complainers and the Tribunal, taxed on an agent and client basis. Publicity was deferred pending any criminal proceedings.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Premeditated and calculated course of conduct
  • Involved attempts to conceal the true position
  • Use of client funds to keep the firm afloat
  • Serious and reprehensible breaches at the extreme end of failing to observe the Accounts Rules

Mitigating factors:

  • No previous findings against the Respondent
  • No client suffered actual financial loss; all funds were recredited/repaid
  • Significant financial and reputational loss already suffered by the Respondent
  • Practising certificate suspended for nearly five years
  • Genuine remorse and shame expressed
  • Difficult personal and financial circumstances including loss of both parents and firm's financial decline
  • 30-year career with previously good reputation
  • Cooperation in ensuring money was repaid

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://www.ssdt.org.uk/findings/law-society-v-louise-elizabeth-sutherland/