Samuel Maurice Charkham
Allegation / charges
Breaches
Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision
Samuel Maurice Charkham, a partner specialising in conveyancing at Simkins LLP, was found to have committed serious racial and sexual misconduct toward two female employees. The Tribunal found proved that he told a racially abusive joke at a Christmas dinner, donned an envelope claiming KKK membership directed at a black secretary (both racially motivated), touched Person A's bottom on more than one occasion (sexually motivated), and touched Person B's backside with his hand. Breaches of Principles 2, 6 and 9 were found. No finding of dishonesty was made. The Tribunal found a lack of insight and rejected his 'playful/old-fashioned humour' explanations. It imposed a Level 4 fine of £30,000, recommended EDI training, and ordered costs of £21,000 (reduced from the £29,950 claimed).
Duties found breached:
- Act in the client's best interests
- Fair dealing with unrepresented parties
- Integrity
- Non-discriminatory acceptance and cab-rank
- No unlawful discrimination or harassment
- Uphold public trust in the profession
Aggravating factors:
- Conduct repeated despite a prior warning/apology requirement after the Christmas incident
- Power imbalance between a partner and junior secretary/accounts staff
- Touching of Person B occurred shortly after the Firm's investigation into similar conduct toward Person A
- Attempts to interfere with witnesses (contacting Person B to withdraw complaint; emailing during investigation)
- Witness statements of his witnesses were led by his own questions and language
- Lack of insight; sought to minimise conduct as 'old-fashioned' jokes and 'playful' humour
- Profound and lasting harm to Person A
Mitigating factors:
- 43 years' previously unblemished career with no prior disciplinary findings
- Cooperation with the Applicant and Tribunal
- Conduct largely spontaneous rather than premeditated (except KKK incident)
- No pressure put on Person A to keep silent
- Tribunal found low risk of repetition and no risk to the public