Skip to main content
discipline 3 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Peter Kenneth Felton Gerber

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number12625/2024
Date12/02/2025
OutcomeFine

Allegation / charges

Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Lack of Integrity, Recklessness, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionFine
FineGBP 45,000
CostsGBP 60,000
Dishonesty foundNo

Peter Kenneth Felton Gerber, a sole practitioner solicitor of 33 years, faced allegations relating to AML compliance failures, false declarations to insurers and the SRA, misuse of client account as a banking facility, and failure to return client funds promptly. The Tribunal found the allegations proved but expressly rejected dishonesty, accepting his genuinely (though unreasonably) held belief in his compliance. It instead found lack of integrity and recklessness. He was fined £45,000 (upper end of Level 4), ordered to pay £60,000 costs, and made subject to indefinite practice restrictions (suspended until 4 April 2025) preventing sole practice, holding client money, and holding compliance roles.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Misconduct was embedded and persisted for several years without remedy
  • Failed to take remedial action even when shortcomings were pointed out
  • Conduct was reckless and lacking in integrity
  • Experienced solicitor who should have known better
  • Limited insight into potential harm to which clients were exposed
  • Only acted when SRA imposed practising certificate restriction

Mitigating factors:

  • No improper gain and none suggested
  • No loss to any party and none suggested
  • No complaints or claims against him
  • 33 years of unblemished practice, first appearance before Tribunal
  • Full cooperation with the SRA and Tribunal
  • Early admissions to some allegations
  • Strong character references
  • Genuine and sincere remorse
  • Genuinely (if unreasonably) held belief in his compliance
  • May have been struggling as a sole practitioner

⚠ figures not found verbatim in the source were dropped: ["review_dishonesty_finding_cue_present"]

Codes & rules applied

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/12625/