Decision record
Kimberley Bridge & John Charles McNabb & Tracy Stansfield & Nicola Roach
Allegation / charges
Breaches, Client Money, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules, Others
Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision
SFN Solicitors was investigated by the SRA after a client account shortfall was reported. The First Respondent, Kimberley Bridge (managing partner), was found to have systematically misappropriated client money, fabricated an entire transaction (Mr & Mrs I), forged documents, and repeatedly lied to the investigating officer over eight months (including false claims about fires, asbestos and a stroke). The minimum cash shortage was £418,099.42. The Tribunal found her dishonest on multiple allegations and struck her off, ordering costs of £31,947.85 jointly and severally with the Fourth Respondent. The Fourth Respondent, Nicola Roach (an employee, the First Respondent's sister), was also found dishonest and made subject to a Section 43 order. The Second Respondent (senior partner) admitted accounts breaches and was fined £10,000, mitigated to £2,000 given his means, plus £8,420 costs (not enforceable without leave). The Third Respondent, who had left the firm on ill-health and self-reported, was reprimanded with £8,420 costs (not enforceable without leave).
Duties found breached:
- Honesty
- No conflict between current clients
- No improper use of client money
- Prompt accounting and return of money
- Accounting records, reconciliation and reports
- Firm governance, systems and compliance
- Professional indemnity insurance
- Report serious misconduct of others
- No baseless or threatened misconduct report
Aggravating factors:
- Premeditated and systematic conduct over a lengthy period
- Presenting forged documents to the investigating officer
- Repeated untruths and deceptions, including fabricating a transaction to cover up misconduct
- Systematic 'teeming and lading' of client monies
- Deceived fellow partners (Second and Third Respondents), causing them financial ruin
- No engagement with the disciplinary process
Mitigating factors:
- No previous disciplinary matters
Duties engaged
- Honesty
- Integrity
- No bribery or improper gifts
- Personal probity and fitness to practise
- Uphold public trust in the profession
- Act in the client's best interests
- Advise objectively, not a mere conduit
- Costs and fee transparency to client
- No conflict between current clients
- No improper use of client money
- Prompt accounting and return of money
- Accounting records, reconciliation and reports
- Firm governance, systems and compliance
- Professional indemnity insurance
- Self-report to the regulator
- Report serious misconduct of others
- No baseless or threatened misconduct report