Skip to main content
discipline 3 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Phillippa Dione Cheong

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number8762/2003
Date01/01/2003
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Client Money, Delays, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules, Others

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
CostsGBP 14,071
Dishonesty foundNo

Sole practitioner Phillippa Dione Cheong faced twelve allegations of conduct unbefitting a solicitor, including practising without a practising certificate, breaches of the Solicitors Accounts Rules, releasing mortgage funds without security, misleading other solicitors, failing to account for trust interest to a beneficiary, and repeatedly ignoring correspondence from solicitors and the OSS. The Tribunal found all allegations proved. Although no dishonesty was alleged or found, the misconduct—particularly the failure to account to trust beneficiary Mrs J-D—was so serious that she was struck off the Roll and ordered to pay costs of £14,071.31. Enforcement directions were made in respect of unpaid OSS costs orders. She had a prior 1997 disciplinary finding for similar failures.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Previous appearance before the Tribunal in 1997 for similar failures (fine of £1,000)
  • Widespread and repeated ignoring of correspondence from solicitors and regulatory body
  • Failure to comply with OSS directions
  • Distress caused to clients Mrs J-D and the late Mrs HB
  • Failure to account for trust interest so serious no one could resolve the mess
  • Continued uncertificated practice despite clear warnings

Mitigating factors:

  • No dishonesty alleged or found
  • Firm in state of decline; sad personal circumstances
  • Respondent bankrupt with financial and childcare difficulties
  • Some efforts to compensate beneficiary by paying her personal bills
  • Cash shortage arose from error and was remedied

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/8762/