Skip to main content
discipline 3 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

E W Orie, Z Orie & 2 Others

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number10059/2008
Date01/01/2008
OutcomeS.43 Order (clerks), Strike off

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules, Others

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
FineGBP 2,000
CostsGBP 40,000
Dishonesty foundYes

Solicitor Mr Orie, his two salaried partners, and his unadmitted clerk wife faced allegations arising from an SRA investigation of Orie & Co. The Tribunal found all allegations substantiated. It made express findings of dishonesty against Mr Orie (party to a conveyancing transaction exhibiting characteristics of fraud) and Mrs Orie (party to such a transaction and signing a TR1 falsely stating the price paid). Mr Orie was struck off; Mrs Orie was made subject to a s.43 order; the two partners were each fined £2,000 for strict-liability accounts breaches. Costs of £40,000 were apportioned severally: £25,000 to Mr Orie, £5,000 to each other Respondent.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Personal involvement of Mr and Mrs Orie as parties to suspicious/fraudulent transactions for personal benefit
  • Premeditated plan to obtain mortgage funding through inaccurate representations to lenders
  • Inaccurate statements made on indemnity insurance proposal and mortgage applications damaging credibility
  • Twenty conveyancing transactions bearing hallmarks of property fraud allowed to proceed

Mitigating factors:

  • No misappropriation of client money; clients paid what they expected
  • Second and Third Respondents had lower culpability, made early admissions and had resigned before the report
  • Reliance on bookkeeper and reporting accountants whose reports were unqualified
  • Law Society monitoring visits had not identified the accounting problems
  • Errors partly one of mislabelling of charges without intent to overcharge
  • Firm closed in orderly way with no client losing money
  • Positive character references; family and financial hardship

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/10059/