Skip to main content
discipline 3 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Mark Delaney

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number7126/1996
Date01/01/1996
OutcomeS.43 Order (clerks)

Allegation / charges

Others

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionOther
CostsGBP 690
Dishonesty foundNo

Mark Delaney, a solicitors' clerk responsible for investment business at McNulty & Co., was found to have occasioned or been party to financial irregularities, including transferring pension monies into investment bonds contrary to legislation. He denied colluding with clients and did not appear at the hearing but faxed that he would not contest the allegation. The Tribunal found the allegation substantiated (no express finding of dishonesty) and made a Section 43(2) order restricting his employment within the solicitors' profession, plus fixed costs of £690.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Failed to reply to the Bureau's letters seeking an explanation
  • Employed on basis of expertise yet acted contrary to regulations he should have known

Mitigating factors:

  • Did not contest the allegation
  • Attributed conduct to stress following failure of his broking firm

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/7126/