§ discipline
‹ Browse decisions

Williams, Jason

JurisdictionAustralia — New South Wales
BodyOffice of the Legal Services Commissioner (NSW) (OLSC)
Professionbarrister
Date24-Mar-2022
HearingCouncil of The New South Wales Bar Association
OutcomeReprimand $0.00 About ​ About the OLSC The Commissioner History Mission statement Structure Contact ​ Contact the OLSC Give us your feedback: online surveys Access to information (GIPAA) Community information ​ Information for lawyers Fact sheets FAQs Other regulatory and complaint-handling organisations Contact LawAccess NSW for legal information " You and Your Lawyer", Hot ​​Topics 78 Legal Information Access Centre (LIAC), State Library of NSW​ , provides access to information about the law in NSW regarding your lawyer Privacy Copyright and Disclaimer Website accessibility

Allegation / charges

<p>Ground One: Breached Rule 8(c) of the Legal Profession Uniform Conduct (Barristers) Rules 2015, in that, by sending an email to various recipients, he engaged in conduct which was likely to diminish public confidence in the legal profession or the administration of justice or otherwise bring the legal profession into disrepute.</p><p>Ground Two: Breached Rule 13(b) of the Legal Profession Uniform Conduct (Barristers) Rules 2015, in that by sending an email to various recipients, he conducted correspondence in his own name on behalf of his client, otherwise than with his opponent.</p><p>Ground Three: Breached Rule 42 of the Legal Profession Uniform Conduct (Barristers) Rules 2015, in that, by sending an email a to various recipients, he acted as the mere mouthpiece of his client, or of his instructing solicitor, and failed to exercise the forensic judgments called for during the case independently.</p> — Unsatisfactory Professional Conduct

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionOther
Dishonesty foundNo

A barrister was found to have engaged in unsatisfactory professional conduct on three grounds arising from sending an email to various recipients: breaching Rule 8(c) (conduct likely to diminish public confidence in the profession), Rule 13(b) (conducting correspondence in his own name on behalf of his client otherwise than with his opponent), and Rule 42 (acting as a mere mouthpiece and failing to exercise independent forensic judgment). No express finding of dishonesty was made and no sanction is stated in the provided text.

Duties found breached:

⚠ figures not found verbatim in the source were dropped: ["extracted_from_register_summary"]

Duties engaged

Documents

No documents recorded.

Source: https://portal.olsc.nsw.gov.au/dasearchbn/daresultdetail?id=44fa67ea-d0cc-4aa0-9634-7f58947d157b