Mark Gittins
Allegation / charges
Breaches, Client Money, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules, Others
Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision
Mark Gittins, a sole practitioner solicitor, faced numerous allegations of conduct unbefitting a solicitor arising from two Forensic Investigation reports revealing client account shortages (£14,152.65 then £32,679.57), accounting rule breaches, fictitious book transfers, substantial overcharging on probate estates, misuse of client funds, and misleading correspondence including failing to disclose a £5,000 cheque payable to himself. The Tribunal heard the matter in his absence after refusing an adjournment. No dishonesty was alleged or found, but the Tribunal found a serious degree of mismanagement and failure to exercise integrity, probity and trustworthiness. He was struck off the Roll and ordered to pay costs subject to detailed assessment.
Duties found breached:
- Proper basis for allegations
- No improper communication with the court
- Not mislead third parties or opponents
- Continuity and handover of representation
- No conflict between current clients
- No improper use of client money
- Accounting records, reconciliation and reports
Aggravating factors:
- Serious degree of mismanagement and ignoring requirement for full compliance with SAR
- Book entries made with no equivalent physical transfer of funds, so books did not show true position
- Substantial overcharging on probate matters (one bill 422% of maximum reasonable amount)
- Using clients' money for own purposes and using one client's money for another
- Cash shortages persisted at second inspection
- Failure to disclose to The Law Society that the £5,000 cheque was payable to himself despite holding a copy showing this
Mitigating factors:
- No allegation of dishonesty made by the Applicant
- Admitted a number of the allegations
- Made some effort to put matters right and made good shortages
- Suffered from depression for several years and had been unable to work
- No report that any clients or members of the public had actually suffered loss
Duties engaged
- Proper basis for allegations
- No improper communication with the court
- Professional independence
- Not mislead third parties or opponents
- Continuity and handover of representation
- No conflict between current clients
- No improper use of client money
- Accounting records, reconciliation and reports
- Diligence and timeliness