Muir, Brian Thomas Gregory
Allegation / charges
<p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">1. Breached Section 61 of the Legal Profession Act 1987 - handling of trust moneys</span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">2. Breached Section 62 of the Legal Profession Act 1987 - keeping of trust accounts</span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">3. Breached Section 255 of the Legal Profession Act 2004 - holding, disbursing and accounting for trust moneys</span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">4. Breached Section 264 of the Legal Profession Act 2004 - failure to keep proper trust records in relation to trust money received</span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">5. Breached Section 117 of the Legal Profession Act 1994 in that he negotiated a mortgage advance to MxChange Pty Ltd.</span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">6. Breached Clauses 72(2)(b), 68(4), 69(4), 70(9) and 80(8) of the Legal Profession Regulation, 2005 and the equivalent Clauses under the Legal Profession Regulation, 2002</span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">7. Failed to properly secure his client’s trust funds</span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">8. Failed to respond to correspondence</span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">9. Delayed in the administration of an Estate</span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">10. Failed to comply with the requirements of Section 67(2)(a) and (b) of the Legal Profession Act, 2004</span></p>
Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision
The decision found the practitioner breached multiple provisions relating to trust money handling, trust account records, mortgage financing, securing client trust funds, responding to correspondence, and delay in estate administration. No express finding of dishonesty and no sanction details are contained in the provided text.
Duties found breached:
- No improper communication with the court
- Uphold public trust in the profession
- No conflict between current clients
- No improper use of client money
- Prompt accounting and return of money
- Not misrepresent regulated status
⚠ figures not found verbatim in the source were dropped: ["extracted_from_register_summary"]
Duties engaged
Other decisions involving this respondent
Matched by respondent name — may include a different person with the same name.
Documents
No documents recorded.
Source: https://portal.olsc.nsw.gov.au/dasearchbn/daresultdetail?id=885ba7df-b633-eb11-bf74-000d3ad1941e