Skip to main content
discipline 30 September 2026

The duty in context

Not mislead the court court

The lawyer must not knowingly or recklessly mislead or attempt to mislead the court (or permit it to be misled), and must promptly correct any misleading statement once aware of it.

380 cases 54% strike-off avg suspension 14.7 mo avg fine 55,578 121 with dishonesty finding

How the codes express this duty

E&W Solicitors SRA Principles & Code CCS 1.4; CCS 2.4 strong 246 cases
1.4 You do not mislead or attempt to mislead your clients, the court or others, either by your own acts or omissions or allowing or being complicit in the acts or omissions of others (including your client). 2.4 You only make assertions or put forward statements, representations or submissions to the court or others which are properly arguable.
E&W Barristers BSB Handbook rC3.1; rC6; gC4 strong 17 cases
rC3.1 you must not knowingly or recklessly mislead or attempt to mislead the court; rC6 Your duty not to mislead the court will include the following obligations: .1 you must not: .a make submissions, representations or any other statement; or .b ask questions which suggest facts to witnesses which you know, or are instructed, are untrue or misleading. gC4 ... knowingly misleading the court also includes inadvertently misleading the court if you later realise that you have misled the court, and you fail to correct the position.
Cayman Islands Legal Services Code 2026 R.2.1(a); R.2.4 strong
not knowingly or recklessly mislead or attempt to mislead the Court or permit the Court to be misled (R.2.4 applies)
AU Solicitors Solicitors' Conduct Rules Rules 19.1; 19.2 strong 77 cases
19.1 A solicitor must not deceive or knowingly or recklessly mislead the court. 19.2 A solicitor must take all necessary steps to correct any misleading statement made by the solicitor to a court as soon as possible after the solicitor becomes aware that the statement was misleading.
AU Barristers Uniform Barristers Rules rr26-27 strong 29 cases
A barrister must not deceive or knowingly or recklessly mislead the Court. A barrister must take all necessary steps to correct any misleading statement made by the barrister to a court as soon as possible after the barrister becomes aware that the statement was misleading.
IE Solicitors Law Society Guide Ch5 — General; Ch5 — The advocate / conducting litigation strong 3 cases
should assist the court in the administration of justice, and should not deceive, or knowingly or recklessly, mislead the court... A solicitor should not assert what they know to be untrue or substantiate a fraud, as that would amount to a positive deception of the court.
IE Barristers Bar Code of Conduct Rule 5.16; Rule 5.3(e) strong 3 cases
Barristers must not deceive or knowingly mislead the court. A Barrister must take appropriate steps to correct any misleading statement made by the Barrister to the court as soon as possible after the Barrister becomes aware that the statement was misleading.
JM Attorneys Canons of Professional Ethics Canon V(o); Canon VI(cc); Canon IV(q)(ii) strong 8 cases
(o) An Attorney shall not knowingly make a false statement of law or fact. ... (cc) An Attorney shall not knowingly represent falsely to a Judge, a Court or other tribunal or an official of a Court, or other tribunal, that a particular state of facts exists.
JE Lawyers Law Society of Jersey Code R.3.1 a); R.3.4 strong
Members must: a) not knowingly or recklessly mislead or attempt to mislead the court or permit the court to be misled (R.3.4 applies)... Members must not: a) make submissions, representations or any other statement, or b) register, file or otherwise lodge any documents with the court, Judicial Greffe or Viscount, that they know, or are instructed, are untrue or misleading.
ON Lawyers LSO Rules of Prof. Conduct r 5.1-2(e) strong
When acting as an advocate, a lawyer shall not ... knowingly attempt to deceive a tribunal or influence the course of justice by offering false evidence, misstating facts or law, presenting or relying upon a false or deceptive affidavit, suppressing what ought to be disclosed, or otherwise assisting in any fraud, crime, or illegal conduct
BC Lawyers BC Code r 5.1-2(e) strong 7 cases
When acting as an advocate, a lawyer must not: ... (e) knowingly attempt to deceive a tribunal or influence the course of justice by offering false evidence, misstating facts or law, presenting or relying upon a false or deceptive affidavit, suppressing what ought to be disclosed or otherwise assisting in any fraud, crime or illegal conduct;
NZ Lawyers Conduct & Client Care Rules r 13.1 strong
A lawyer has an absolute duty of honesty to the court and must not mislead or deceive the court.
SCO Solicitors LSS Standards of Conduct B1.13 strong 8 cases
You must never knowingly give false or misleading information to the court.
SG Lawyers Professional Conduct Rules 2015 r 9 (Conduct of proceedings) partial 6 cases
9 Conduct of proceedings
HK Solicitors Solicitors' Guide Principle 10.03 strong
A solicitor must never knowingly attempt to deceive or participate in the deception of a court. ... He must not, however, himself knowingly put forward or let his client put forward false information with intent to mislead the court.
HK Barristers Bar Code of Conduct para 10.30 strong
A practising barrister must not knowingly deceive or mislead the Court.

Cases dealing with this duty

Clear

380 decisions · link basis: found breached = a tribunal finding; rule cited = the mapped provision is cited in the decision; text match = high-precision text pattern

  • Andrew James Cutland
    SDT solicitor 12467/2023 2023-10-27 rule cited

    Breaches, Client Money, Code of Conduct 2011, Dishonesty, Lack of Integrity, Solicitors' Accounts Rules, SRA Principles 2011

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Jonah David Michael
    SDT solicitor 12444/2023 2023-07-10 rule cited

    Breaches, Failures

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Andrew Stevenson & Janet Stevenson
    SDT solicitor 12431/2023 2023-06-21 found breached

    Breaches, Solicitors' Accounts Rules

    Suspend - Fixed Period 1 PDF View decision
  • Richard Michael Cohen
    SDT solicitor 12432/2023 2023-06-09 rule cited

    Breaches, Failures

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Dehsabzi, Sayar
    OLSC solicitor Dehsabzi Lawyers 2023-05-18 found breached text match

    The Respondent Solicitor has misled the Legal Profession Admission Board and the New South Wales Bar Association when he advised them by letter dated 16 January 2019 that the Complainant did not disclose to him or his f…

    Fine Reprimand Solicitor to undertake and complete further legal education $2,500.00 About ​ About the OLSC The Commissioner History Mission statement Structure Contact ​ Contact the OLSC Give us your feedback: online surveys Access to information (GIPAA) Community information ​ Information for lawyers Fact sheets FAQs Other regulatory and complaint-handling organisations Contact LawAccess NSW for legal information " You and Your Lawyer", Hot ​​Topics 78 Legal Information Access Centre (LIAC), State Library of NSW​ , provides access to information about the law in NSW regarding your lawyer Privacy Copyright and Disclaimer Website accessibility View decision
  • Sophia Andrea Thomas
    GLC attorney 52 of 2019 2022-09-30 found breached text match

    Suspended | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered September 30, 2022 | Guilty of Professional Misconduct | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered July 29, 2022. View PDF DECISION ON SANCTION OF THE DISCIPLINARY C…

    Suspended 1 PDF View decision
  • Sophia Andrea Thomas
    GLC attorney 52 of 2019 2022-07-29 rule cited

    Guilty of Professional Misconduct | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered July 29, 2022 | Suspended | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered September 30, 2022. View PDF DECISION OF THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF …

    Guilty of Professional Misconduct 6 PDFs View decision
  • Duncan Peter Burtwell
    SDT solicitor 12301/2022 2022-04-08 found breached rule cited

    Breaches

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • RICHARD JAMES LAWSON
    LPBWA lawyer 7 Wilberforce Street MOUNT HAWTHORN WA 6016 Legal Profession Complaints Committee and Lawson [2021] WASAT 152, Legal Profession Complaints Committee and Lawson [2021] WASAT 152 (S) 2021-11-30 found breached

    Professional Misconduct, referral to Supreme Court

    Professional Misconduct, referral to Supreme Court 2 PDFs View decision
  • Hiramanek, Zubin
    OLSC solicitor State Lawyers Pty Ltd 2021-09-02 text match

    (i) Acting without instructions; (ii) Providing false information in two affidavits and an email; and (iii) Attempting to mislead the court. — Unsatisfactory Professional Conduct

    Fine Reprimand $2,500.00 About ​ About the OLSC The Commissioner History Mission statement Structure Contact ​ Contact the OLSC Give us your feedback: online surveys Access to information (GIPAA) Community information ​ Information for lawyers Fact sheets FAQs Other regulatory and complaint-handling organisations Contact LawAccess NSW for legal information " You and Your Lawyer", Hot ​​Topics 78 Legal Information Access Centre (LIAC), State Library of NSW​ , provides access to information about the law in NSW regarding your lawyer Privacy Copyright and Disclaimer Website accessibility View decision
  • Watkins, Gregory James
    OLSC barrister Edmund Barton Chambers 2021-07-27 rule cited

    Breached rules 8, 24, 25, 27 and 28 of the Legal Profession Uniform Conduct (Barristers) Rules 2015 (NSW) (duty to the court) — Unsatisfactory Professional Conduct

    Reprimand $0.00 About ​ About the OLSC The Commissioner History Mission statement Structure Contact ​ Contact the OLSC Give us your feedback: online surveys Access to information (GIPAA) Community information ​ Information for lawyers Fact sheets FAQs Other regulatory and complaint-handling organisations Contact LawAccess NSW for legal information " You and Your Lawyer", Hot ​​Topics 78 Legal Information Access Centre (LIAC), State Library of NSW​ , provides access to information about the law in NSW regarding your lawyer Privacy Copyright and Disclaimer Website accessibility View decision
  • Paul Anthony Garrett
    SSDT solicitor Paul Anthony Garrett, 12 Tweedsmuir Crescent, Bearsden, Glasgow 2021-02-23 found breached text match
    strike_off No Appeal 1 PDF View decision
  • Sandra Campbell
    SDT solicitor 12228/2021 2021-01-01 found breached text match

    Breaches, Client Money, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Thorpe, Terrance William
    OLSC barrister Sir Owen Dixon Chambers [2020] NSWCATOD 133 2020-11-24 found breached text match

    Ground 1: Breached Rule 62 of the Bar Rules when he failed to inform the defence representatives, or the Court: (a) of the fact that a key prosecution witness said at a witness conference, attended by the Respondent on …

    Reprimand $0.00 Proceedings Instituted 1 PDF View decision
  • Bayard, Jacinta Louise
    OLSC solicitor Bayard Law Pty Ltd 2020-11-05 found breached text match

    1. Transfer trust money from controlled money account without proper authority, in breach of section 139 of the Legal Profession Uniform Law (NSW) 2. Failed to provide statements in relation to the trust account when re…

    Reprimand $0.00 About ​ About the OLSC The Commissioner History Mission statement Structure Contact ​ Contact the OLSC Give us your feedback: online surveys Access to information (GIPAA) Community information ​ Information for lawyers Fact sheets FAQs Other regulatory and complaint-handling organisations Contact LawAccess NSW for legal information " You and Your Lawyer", Hot ​​Topics 78 Legal Information Access Centre (LIAC), State Library of NSW​ , provides access to information about the law in NSW regarding your lawyer Privacy Copyright and Disclaimer Website accessibility View decision
  • Michael Lloyd Wilson
    GLC attorney 128 of 2019 2020-10-31 rule cited

    Guilty of Professional Misconduct | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered October 31, 2020. || Struck off | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered July 31, 2021. || Formal Order View PDF DECISION OF THE DISCIPLIN…

    Guilty of Professional Misconduct 2 PDFs View decision
  • CHRISTINA MARIE CHANG
    LPBWA lawyer Unit 4, Second Floor 108 Wanneroo Road TUART HILL WA 6060 Legal Profession Complaints Committee v Chang [2019] WASAT 67 (S) 2020-05-15 text match

    Professional Misconduct. Referral to Supreme Court (full bench) recommending name be removed from the roll of practitioners

    Professional Misconduct. Referral to Supreme Court (full bench) recommending name be removed from the roll of practitioners 2 PDFs View decision
  • Roger Patrick Diavewa
    SDT solicitor 12134/2020 2020-01-01 found breached text match
    Revocation of S.43 Order - Refused 1 PDF View decision
  • QURAT UL AIN AKBAR
    SDT solicitor 12093/2020 2020-01-01 found breached text match

    Breaches, Failures

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Gillian Margaret Walker
    SDT solicitor 12095/2020 2020-01-01 found breached

    Breaches

    S.43 Order (clerks) 1 PDF View decision
  • Nicholas Peter Whiffen
    SDT solicitor 12116/2020 2020-01-01 text match

    Breaches, Client Money, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Alberto Khadra-Pozo
    SDT solicitor 12063/2020 2020-01-01 found breached text match

    Breaches, Failures

    Suspend - Indefinite 1 PDF View decision
  • Homayoun Sebastian Nejat
    LSBC lawyer 2019-10-24 found breached

    Rule 4-29 Admission of Misconduct and Undertaking | Summary

    Rule 4-29 Admission of Misconduct and Undertaking | Summary 1 PDF View decision
  • Donald Alexander Boyd
    LSBC lawyer 2019-09-26 found breached

    Rule 4-29 Admission of Misconduct and Undertaking | Summary

    Rule 4-29 Admission of Misconduct and Undertaking | Summary 1 PDF View decision
  • CHRISTINA MARIE CHANG
    LPBWA lawyer Unit 4, Second Floor 108 Wanneroo Road TUART HILL WA 6060 Legal Profession Complaints Committee v Chang [2019] WASAT 2019-09-09 text match

    Professional Misconduct

    Professional Misconduct 2 PDFs View decision

Duty classification does not yet cover every jurisdiction (Ontario, New Zealand and Singapore decisions are indexed but not yet duty-classified), so counts here understate those corpora.