§ discipline
‹ Browse decisions

Mohammed Shariful Islam & Another

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number10340/2009
Date01/01/2009
OutcomeFine, Strike off

Allegation / charges

Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules, Others

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
FineGBP 2,000
CostsGBP 165,000
Dishonesty foundYes

The SDT found First Respondent Mohammed Shariful Islam acted dishonestly across numerous Barclays and Alliance & Leicester conveyancing transactions, certifying inflated purchase prices to lenders, failing to apply mortgage funds to purchases, breaching undertakings, using client account as a banking facility, and diverting surplus funds to third parties including a company he controlled. He was struck off the Roll and ordered to pay £156,750 costs (95% of £165,000). The Second Respondent, a newly qualified salaried partner found to have signed Certificates of Title without proper familiarisation and breached accounts rules (no dishonesty), was fined £2,000 and ordered to pay £8,250 costs (not enforceable without leave).

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Systematic dishonesty by First Respondent
  • Widespread misconduct involving vast sums and mortgage fraud on a massive scale
  • Inflated purchase prices certified to lenders with surplus funds paid to third parties and to a company (Feroza Housing Ltd) in which First Respondent had a personal interest
  • Forged signatures referenced on documents
  • Failure to engage with proceedings and failure to file accountant's reports

Mitigating factors:

  • Second Respondent: no dishonesty, naive and trusting, newly qualified and inexperienced
  • Second Respondent marginalised and manipulated/bullied by the dominant First Respondent
  • Second Respondent cooperative during investigation
  • Second Respondent's difficult personal background, poor health (depression) and dire financial circumstances
  • No previous disciplinary matters for either Respondent
  • Second Respondent's peripheral involvement (three transactions)

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/10340/