§ discipline
‹ Browse decisions

Trevor Michael Jones

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number8564/2002
Date01/01/2002
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Client Money, Others

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
CostsGBP 3,750
Dishonesty foundNo

Trevor Michael Jones, a solicitor and senior partner, admitted conduct unbefitting a solicitor. He took and retained windfall conversion shares due to two estates for which he was executor, misused two clients' funds (totalling £17,645.95) for another client and to meet a firm liability, made false cheque-stub and book entries, and gave misleading accounts to his client and the OSS. The minimum cash shortage was about £20,503.76, of which £19,947.56 arose from his misuse, all later made good. The Tribunal found all allegations substantiated, rejected the claim that the behaviour was aberrational, and struck him off the Roll, ordering costs of £3,750. Notably, the word 'dishonest' was not used by the applicant and the Tribunal made no express finding of dishonesty.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Pattern of behaviour over a period from mid-1999 to end of 2000, not a single aberration
  • Respondent was at all times aware that what he was doing was wrong
  • Deprived estate beneficiaries of windfall shares to which they were entitled
  • Deliberate use of one client's money for another client and to meet the firm's own liability
  • Breach of trust and proper stewardship of client funds

Mitigating factors:

  • Long, successful and previously unblemished career since admission in 1972
  • Prompt and full restitution to those affected
  • Full and frank disclosure when notified of the accounts inspection; absolved partners and colleagues
  • Considerable pressure of work (12-14 hour days) and personal difficulties (marriage breakdown, heavier drinking)
  • Medical evidence and supportive testimonials
  • Sincere apologies and deep remorse
  • No motive of greed or need for money; intended that no client should suffer loss

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/8564/