§ discipline
‹ Browse decisions

Andrew John Davies

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number11484/2016
Date01/01/2016
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
CostsGBP 65,867
Dishonesty foundYes

Andrew John Davies, sole equity partner at Robert Meaton & Co, faced nine allegations of misconduct. The SDT found proved (beyond reasonable doubt) eight allegations including improper transfers of client money to his personal account (£270,398.17 and £205,714.20 via fictitious bank User IDs), failure to keep accounting records, failure to replace a minimum cash shortage of £833,450.04, misleading the Forensic Investigation Officer with falsified statements and forged emails, misleading clients with falsified bank statements, providing forged building regulation certificates, and forging a QC's opinion and fabricating a clerk's email. Allegation 2.8 (misleading chambers) was not proved due to a drafting issue. The Tribunal made express findings of dishonesty on allegations 2.5, 2.6, 2.7 and 2.9 under the Twinsectra test. The Respondent did not attend; the hearing proceeded in his absence. He was struck off the Roll and ordered to pay costs of £65,867.40 (including substantial forensic investigation costs).

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Conduct motivated by personal financial gain
  • Planned and deliberate, calculated and repeated misconduct that appeared to be escalating
  • Took client money and paid it into his personal account; theft, forgery and fabrication of evidence involved
  • Concealed wrongdoing and went to significant efforts to cover his tracks
  • Abused position of trust as senior and only equity partner and co-executor
  • Misled clients, employees and the Regulator
  • Foreseeable and intended harm; clients lost substantial sums and claims made against compensation fund

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/11484/