Skip to main content
discipline 30 September 2026

The duty in context

Handle inadvertently received material client

On receiving confidential or privileged material disclosed by mistake, the lawyer must not use it and must return, destroy or delete it and notify the other party.

391 cases 60% strike-off avg suspension 17.5 mo avg fine 52,909 172 with dishonesty finding

How the codes express this duty

E&W Solicitors SRA Principles & Code CCS 6.4(d) partial 227 cases
6.4 ... except when: ... (d) the information is contained in a privileged document that you have knowledge of only because it has been mistakenly disclosed.
E&W Barristers BSB Handbook rC26.6; gC86 partial 7 cases
rC26 You may cease to act on a matter on which you are instructed and return your instructions if: ... .6 you become aware of confidential or privileged information or documents of another person which relate to the matter on which you are instructed;
Cayman Islands Legal Services Code 2026 R.5.2.2(b) partial
where the information in question is received under a duty of confidence, including mistaken disclosure, or receipt where it is agreed with the client that no duty to disclose arises or a different standard of disclosure applies
AU Solicitors Solicitors' Conduct Rules Rules 31.1; 31.3 strong 61 cases
31.1 ...a solicitor to whom material known or reasonably suspected to be confidential is disclosed... and who is aware that the disclosure was inadvertent must not use the material and must: 31.1.1 return, destroy or delete the material (as appropriate) immediately upon becoming aware that disclosure was inadvertent; and 31.1.2 notify the other solicitor or the other person of the disclosure... 31.3 If a solicitor is instructed by a client to read confidential material received in error, the solicitor must refuse to do so.
AU Barristers Uniform Barristers Rules no clear equivalent
IE Solicitors Law Society Guide Ch4 — Material disclosed by mistake; Receipt of information intended for the other party strong 34 cases
If a privileged communication is inadvertently disclosed to another party, the solicitor can still assert privilege on behalf of the client. Solicitors should not knowingly open privileged communications not addressed to the solicitor or the solicitor's firm. If a solicitor mistakenly acquires such communications, then privilege is retained by the sender.
IE Barristers Bar Code of Conduct Rule 7.6 partial 34 cases
No Barrister shall use for any professional or private purpose or otherwise disclose any information on professional matters obtained accidentally or otherwise from observation of documents or from conversation with or between colleagues in or outside of the Law Library.
JM Attorneys Canons of Professional Ethics no clear equivalent
JE Lawyers Law Society of Jersey Code G.2.20-G.2.21 strong
If, during the course of a matter, a member receives information or documents from either a client or a third party, which clearly appear to have been (a) disclosed inadvertently or (b) obtained improperly, the member must return such information or documents to the rightful owner without use being made of the information or documents.
ON Lawyers LSO Rules of Prof. Conduct r 7.2-10 partial
A lawyer who receives a document relating to the representation of the lawyer's client and knows or reasonably ought to know that the document was inadvertently sent shall promptly notify the sender.
BC Lawyers BC Code r 7.2-10 strong 21 cases
A lawyer who has access to or comes into possession of a document that the lawyer has reasonable grounds to believe belongs to or is intended for an opposing party and was not intended for the lawyer to see, must: (a) in the case of a paper document, return it unread and uncopied to the party to whom it belongs, (b) in the case of an electronic document, delete it unread and uncopied and advise the party to whom it belongs that that was done,
NZ Lawyers Conduct & Client Care Rules r 13.9.4 strong
If a lawyer becomes aware that privileged information or documents have been inadvertently released in circumstances where privilege has not been waived, the lawyer must not disclose the contents of the material to a client, must inform the other lawyer (or litigant if unrepresented) of the release, and must return any documents forthwith.
SCO Solicitors LSS Standards of Conduct no clear equivalent
SG Lawyers Professional Conduct Rules 2015 no clear equivalent
HK Solicitors Solicitors' Guide Principle 8.03 Commentary 6 strong
Where it is obvious to a solicitor that documents have been mistakenly disclosed to him on discovery or otherwise he must immediately cease to read the documents, inform the other side and return the documents without making copies. The solicitor should inform his client.
HK Barristers Bar Code of Conduct para 10.45 partial
If before or during a case, a document belonging to the other side should come into the possession of Counsel, he should if he intends to make any use of it inform his opponent that it has come into his possession. This information should be communicated in sufficient time for the opponent to raise an objection to the use of the document.

Cases dealing with this duty

Clear

391 decisions · link basis: found breached = a tribunal finding; rule cited = the mapped provision is cited in the decision; text match = high-precision text pattern

  • Mubeen Kashmiri & Mahendra Chandmal Jain
    SDT solicitor 9657/2007 2007-01-01 found breached

    Breaches, Client Money, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules, Others

    Strike off, Suspend - Indefinite 1 PDF View decision
  • Alan Monro Simpson
    SSDT solicitor Alan Monro Simpson, 48 Thomson Drive, Bearsden, Glasgow 2006-05-04 found breached
    strike_off No Appeal 1 PDF View decision
  • Pitsikas, Spero
    OLSC solicitor S Pitsikas & Associates [2006] NSWADT 102 2006-04-07 found breached

    1. Failure to account for trust money in breach of Section 61 of the Legal Profession Act 1987 2. Failure to keep proper trust records in breach of Section 62 of the Legal Profession Act 1987 3. Wilful breaches of trust…

    Costs Removal of practitioner's name from the Roll of Local Lawyers $0.00 Proceedings Instituted 1 PDF View decision
  • Paul Angelo Winn
    LSBC lawyer 2006-02-15 found breached

    Agreed Statement of Facts

    Agreed Statement of Facts View decision
  • Nicholas Gerard McCormick
    SSDT solicitor Nicholas Gerard McCormick, Solicitor, 28 Victoria Street, Newton Stewart 2006-01-11 found breached
    strike_off No Appeal 1 PDF View decision
  • U Bajela, C Collison, S Tackie-Oblie, F Anafi
    SDT solicitor 9400 2006-01-01 found breached

    Client Money, Criminal Convictions, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Kerry Ann Verrall
    SDT solicitor 9398/2006 2006-01-01 found breached

    Others

    S.43 Order (clerks) 1 PDF View decision
  • Stephen Anthony John-Cyrus
    SDT solicitor 9435/2006 2006-01-01 found breached

    Others

    S.43 Order (clerks) 1 PDF View decision
  • Lee, Siu Kay Michael
    OLSC solicitor Michael Lee Solicitor [2005] NSWADT 242 2005-09-28 found breached

    1. Breach of trust account provisions by failing to deposit trust monies into a trust account (x4) 2. Breach of trust account provisions by: failed to retain duplicate receipts for trust money failed to maintain a recor…

    Additional Orders made by the Tribunal (see Tribunal decision) Costs Fine Practitioner to undertake and complete further legal education Practitioner's practice to be subjected to periodic inspection Reprimand $1,000.00 Proceedings Instituted 1 PDF View decision
  • Sean Bourke
    LSI solicitor Sean Bourke, 29 Upper Fitzwilliam Street, Dublin 2 2005-07-11 found breached

    Record no 2005 no 32 SA In the matter of Sean Bourke, a solicitor practising as Sean Bourke, 29 Upper Fitzwilliam Street, Dublin 2, and in the matter of the Solicitors Acts 1954-2002 Law Society of Ireland (applicant) S…

    strike_off View decision
  • ROBERT PETER WESTON
    LPBWA lawyer PO Box 7505 Cloisters Square PERTH WA 6850 Legal Practitioners Complaints Committee v Weston [2005] WASCA 81 2005-04-15 found breached

    Struck Off the Roll of Practitioners

    Struck Off the Roll of Practitioners 1 PDF View decision
  • Arlean D. Moreta Beckford
    GLC attorney 146 of 2002 2005-01-29 found breached

    Fined | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered January 29, 2005. View PDF FORMAL ORDER OF THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE GENERAL LEGAL COUNCIL MADE ON COMPLAINT NO. 146/2002 IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPLAINT BY WILBE…

    Fined 1 PDF View decision
  • Christopher Onyeka Agwu & Another
    SDT solicitor 9337/2005 2005-01-01 found breached

    Client Money, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules, Others

    Fine, Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • David Roy Edwin Sims
    SDT solicitor 9367/2005 2005-01-01 found breached

    Failures, Others

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Eileen Maude
    SDT solicitor 9336/2005 2005-01-01 found breached

    Others

    S.43 Order (clerks) 1 PDF View decision
  • Adrian Gerard Donkin
    SDT solicitor 9184/2005 2005-01-01 found breached

    Breaches, Client Money, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules, Others

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Louis Hardy Charlebois
    SDT solicitor 9315/2005 2005-01-01 found breached

    Breaches, Client Money, Delays, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules, Others

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Stephen Morecroft
    SDT solicitor 9356/2005 2005-01-01 found breached

    Breaches, Client Money, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules, Others

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Harry Goldman
    SDT solicitor 9181/2005 2005-01-01 found breached

    Breaches, Client Money, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules, Others

    Suspend - Indefinite 1 PDF View decision
  • Seamus McGuinness
    SDT solicitor 9349/2005 2005-01-01 found breached

    Others

    S.43 Order (clerks) 1 PDF View decision
  • Nicholas Pounder
    SDT solicitor 9334/2005 2005-01-01 found breached

    Client Money, Criminal Convictions

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Krayem, Ghaith
    OLSC solicitor [2004] NSWADT 240 2004-10-19 found breached

    1. Breach Clause 36 of the Legal Profession Regulation 1994 by failing to prepare monthly bank reconciliations 2. Breach Clause 39 of the Legal Profession Regulation 1994 by failing to prepare monthly trial balances of …

    Costs Removal of practitioner's name from the Roll of Local Lawyers $0.00 Proceedings Instituted 1 PDF View decision
  • Holt, Michael Francis
    OLSC solicitor Holt & Allen 2004-08-11 found breached

    1. Wilfully contravened the provisions of Section 61 of the Legal Profession Act, 1987 - handling of trust moneys 2. Wilfully contravened the provisions of Section 62 of the Legal Profession Act, 1987 - failure to keep …

    Cancellation of Practising Certificate $0.00 About ​ About the OLSC The Commissioner History Mission statement Structure Contact ​ Contact the OLSC Give us your feedback: online surveys Access to information (GIPAA) Community information ​ Information for lawyers Fact sheets FAQs Other regulatory and complaint-handling organisations Contact LawAccess NSW for legal information " You and Your Lawyer", Hot ​​Topics 78 Legal Information Access Centre (LIAC), State Library of NSW​ , provides access to information about the law in NSW regarding your lawyer Privacy Copyright and Disclaimer Website accessibility View decision
  • Damian P Moynihan
    LSI solicitor Moynihan Mulvihill & Co, 6 Cornmarket Street, Cork 2004-07-12 found breached

    In the matter of Damian P Moynihan and Sean A Mulvihill, solicitors, formerly carrying on practice under the style and title of Moynihan Mulvihill & Co at 6 Cornmarket Street, Cork, and in the matter of the Solicitors A…

    strike_off View decision
  • Therol E. L. Voche
    GLC attorney 92 of 2001 2004-03-06 found breached

    Struck off | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered March 06, 2004. View PDF REASONS FOR DECISION Complaint No. 92 of 2001 In the matter of JEFFREY DUJON, Cricket Coach and Therol Voche, an Attorney-at-Law AND In the…

    Struck off 1 PDF View decision

Duty classification does not yet cover every jurisdiction (Ontario, New Zealand and Singapore decisions are indexed but not yet duty-classified), so counts here understate those corpora.