David Grant
Allegation / charges
Breaches, Client Money, Criminal Convictions, Solicitors' Accounts Rules
Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision
David Grant, a solicitor admitted in 1974 and sole equity partner/COFA of Tracey Barlow Furniss & Co, was the subject of SRA proceedings resolved by an agreed outcome. He admitted seven allegations including failing to report the firm's financial difficulties, failing to apply to become a recognised sole practitioner, an improper £50,000-related client account withdrawal, failures in supervising bookkeepers and handling residual client balances, unauthorised transfers to office account, and convictions on 6 December 2019 for one count of theft (stealing £95,740.15 from clients) and two counts of money laundering (depriving a deceased's estate of £6,000), for which he was sentenced to two years' imprisonment. The Tribunal found dishonesty arising from the criminal convictions, assessed culpability and harm as high, and concluded that striking off was the only appropriate sanction. He was struck off the Roll and ordered to pay costs of £14,073.75. Allegations 1.4 and 1.8 were withdrawn.
Duties found breached:
- Proper basis for allegations
- Integrity
- No improper use of client money
- Prompt accounting and return of money
- Report serious misconduct of others
- Not misrepresent regulated status
Aggravating factors:
- Convicted of dishonesty offences (theft and money laundering)
- Conduct was deliberate, calculated and repeated over a period of time
- Took advantage of long-standing clients who placed trust in him
- Used £6,000 taken from a deceased's estate for personal matters
- Stole over £95,000 from clients over a nine-month period
- Tried to conceal the theft by persuading two clients to give false/misleading information to the regulator
- Ought to have known conduct breached obligations to protect public and reputation of profession
Mitigating factors:
- Previously unblemished record over 46 years' practice
- Admissions to allegations indicating a degree of insight
- Belief that proceeds from sale of his property and business would cover liabilities
- Negotiations with another solicitor to join the firm fell through
- Excessive reliance on his office manager
Duties engaged
- Proper basis for allegations
- Honesty
- Integrity
- No bribery or improper gifts
- Personal probity and fitness to practise
- Uphold public trust in the profession
- No unlawful discrimination or harassment
- Act in the client's best interests
- Advise objectively, not a mere conduit
- No improper benefit, loan or bequest
- No improper use of client money
- Prompt accounting and return of money
- Self-report to the regulator
- Report serious misconduct of others
- AML and crime-prevention compliance
- Not misrepresent regulated status