§ discipline
‹ Back

Sverre Nils Aaen (1)

JurisdictionScotland
BodyScottish Solicitors' Discipline Tribunal (SSDT)
Professionsolicitor — Sverre Nils Aaen, formerly having a place of business at LTO Ltd, 81 St. Vincent Street, Glasgow
Date24th Feb 2025
AppealNo Appeal

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionReprimand
Dishonesty foundNo

Sverre Nils Aaen, former director of LSO Ltd (formerly Aaen Peach Ltd) in Glasgow which ceased practice in 2019, was found guilty of professional misconduct for failing and/or delaying in delivering, facilitating access to, or responding to enquiries from former clients and their new representatives regarding files and papers after the firm's cessation, in breach of Rules B1.4.1 and B1.9.1 of the 2011 Practice Rules. He failed to provide contact details on cessation, did not engage with the Law Society despite numerous client enquiries, and instructed destruction of files in storage while denying others (including former co-director Eric Miller) access. The Respondent did not attend and largely disengaged from proceedings, which proceeded in his absence. The Tribunal expressly declined to find a breach of Rule B1.2 (integrity), being not satisfied his integrity was called into question, and made no finding of dishonesty. He was censured, found liable for the expenses of the Complainers and Tribunal (taxed on an agent and client basis, unit rate £14.00, no fixed sum stated), and publicity including his name at his former business address was directed.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Failure caused concern for a significant number of clients (over 50) and their new agents
  • Respondent attempted to prevent access to files held in storage (instructed destruction of 137 boxes), hampering resolution of outstanding enquiries
  • Failed to provide a postal/contact address on cessation, frustrating contact

Mitigating factors:

  • Conduct at the lower end of the scale of misconduct and effectively a one-off incident
  • No previous findings of professional misconduct (only one finding of unsatisfactory professional conduct)
  • No evidence that any client suffered loss
  • Respondent no longer practising and had moved abroad, so low risk to the public

Documents

Source: https://www.ssdt.org.uk/findings/law-society-v-sverre-nils-aaen-1/