Graeme Henry Taylor; Russell Harvey Shapiro
Allegation / charges
Code of Conduct 2007, Code of Conduct 2011, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, Lack of Integrity, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019
Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision
Graeme Taylor (head of probate) and Russell Shapiro (head of conveyancing), partners at Gelbergs, were found to have knowingly caused or allowed documents containing false and misleading information to be submitted to HM Land Registry. Properties from the estate of the late Mohammed Taj were transferred into fictitious/alias names (e.g. Maurice Slater, Nicola Webb, Lisa Sinks, Frank Noble, Martin Lagoda) for Mr Ali and Mrs Ali, concealing true ownership from HMLR and the local authority. The First Respondent admitted the conduct and that HMLR was deliberately misled but denied dishonesty; he did not attend. The Second Respondent ultimately denied involvement, claiming the First Respondent forged his references, but the Tribunal relied on his August 2023 letter admitting knowledge and found he acquiesced. The Tribunal found all allegations proved against both, including dishonesty, lack of integrity and breach of public trust. Culpability and harm assessed as very high. No exceptional circumstances under Sharma/James. Both struck off the Roll. Costs of £70,000 split £60,000 (First Respondent) and £10,000 (Second Respondent).
Duties found breached:
Aggravating factors:
- Dishonesty found
- Conduct deliberate and calculated to circumvent rules designed to protect the public
- Repeated misconduct over a lengthy period (2010-2020)
- Conduct involved submission of false and misleading documents to HM Land Registry
- No genuine insight
- Second Respondent resiled from earlier admissions
Mitigating factors:
- No previous disciplinary findings against either Respondent
- First Respondent made some admissions and indicated he expected removal from the Roll
Codes & rules applied
Duties engaged
- Act only on proper, lawful instructions
- Advise on alternatives, settlement and outcome
- Avoid wasting the court's time
- Cease acting on client perjury or disobedience
- Client-care and engagement terms
- Client confidentiality
- Competence
- Complaints procedure and handling
- Comply with and respect court orders
- Comply with rules of foreign jurisdictions
- Continuity and handover of representation
- Cooperate openly with regulators
- Costs and fee transparency to client
- Diligence and timeliness
- Disclose adverse law to the court
- Disclose material information to client
- Disclose referrals, commissions and benefits
- Fair dealing with unrepresented parties
- Fair, reasonable and lawful fees
- Full disclosure on ex parte applications
- Good faith and courtesy to colleagues
- Handle inadvertently received material
- Hold a current practising certificate
- Honour professional undertakings
- Keep client informed and respond promptly
- Maintain competence and CPD
- Manage conflict arising mid-matter
- No abuse of process or coercive powers
- No acting against a former client
- No baseless or threatened misconduct report
- No conflict between current clients
- No direct dealing with represented party
- No improper benefit, loan or bequest
- No improper communication with the court
- No improper fee-sharing or partnership
- No improper questioning of witnesses
- No improper solicitation or touting
- Non-discriminatory acceptance and cab-rank
- No obstruction or victimisation of reporters
- No own-interest conflict
- No payments to witnesses on evidence
- No personal opinion or familiarity with court
- No prejudicial publicity for pending cases
- No standing bail or surety for client
- No taking unfair advantage
- No tampering with or coaching witnesses
- Not mislead the court
- Not mislead third parties or opponents
- Not misrepresent regulated status
- Pay instructed practitioners and agents
- Professional indemnity insurance
- Proper basis for allegations
- Proper termination and return of instructions
- Prosecutorial duty of disclosure
- Prosecutorial fairness and impartiality
- Protect capacity and vulnerable clients
- Protect legal professional privilege
- Report serious misconduct of others
- Safeguard documents and limit liens
- Self-report to the regulator
- Truthful, non-misleading advertising