Harold C. Brady
Allegation / charges
Reprimanded | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered May 24, 2011. View PDF FORMAL ORDER OF THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE GENERAL LEGAL COUNCIL MADE ON COMPLAINT NO. 65 OF 2009 IN THE MATTER OF ALVA & RARANE LANGLEY vs HAROLD …
Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision
The Disciplinary Committee of the General Legal Council found attorney Harold Brady guilty of professional misconduct in breach of Canon 1(b). The complainants (Alva & Rarane Langley) had entered into agreements for sale and construction of a townhouse (combined consideration US$300,000) with KES, which ran into financial difficulties. Brady represented Arc, assignee of the balance due, and gave notice of assignment. He knew the J$14 million mortgage proceeds exceeded the amount due to his client, and by remaining silent/non-responsive to the complainants' attorneys' letters, led them to believe the excess would be returned. He instead paid the entire J$14 million to his client KES. A settlement with KES meant the complainants were not out of pocket. The Committee made no express finding of dishonesty. The attorney was reprimanded and ordered to pay J$250,000 in costs.
Duties found breached:
Duties engaged
Other decisions involving this respondent
Matched by respondent name — may include a different person with the same name.
Documents
Source: https://www.generallegalcouncil.org/judgement/harold-c-brady-complaint-no-65-of-2009/