§ discipline
‹ Browse decisions

David Andrew Gatherer

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number8973/2004
Date01/01/2004
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Client Money, Criminal Convictions, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules, Others

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
Dishonesty foundYes

Solicitor David Andrew Gatherer was convicted on indictment of conspiracy to defraud at Newcastle Crown Court on 23 September 2003 and sentenced to 18 months imprisonment on 16 January 2004. By agreement, the Tribunal proceeded only on the conviction allegation (allegation xii); the remaining allegations (conflicts of interest, misappropriation of client funds, accounts rule breaches, acting for both buyer and seller, misleading the investigating officer, etc.) were left to lie on the file. The Tribunal found the allegation substantiated, holding that conviction for a dishonesty offence is incompatible with the integrity required of a solicitor. The Respondent did not attend (subject to a home detention curfew) but wrote a letter; he was struck off the Roll and ordered to pay costs (including those for allegations not proceeded with and the Investigation Accountant's costs), subject to detailed assessment if not agreed.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Conviction for conspiracy to defraud - a dishonesty offence
  • Custodial sentence of 18 months imposed
  • Abuse of privileged and trusted position as a solicitor and estate agent
  • Judge found he took the greater blame as a qualified solicitor
  • Removed material from files to conceal the deception
  • Permitted client to use a false identity

Mitigating factors:

  • Expressed remorse and apology in his letter
  • Cited 20 years of service to the community
  • Client letters of support and praise from colleagues
  • Co-operated with the intervention

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/8973/