Arthur G. Kitchin
Allegation / charges
Struck off, Restitution Ordered | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered June 23, 2012. View PDF DECISION OF THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE GENERAL LEGAL COUNCIL IN THE MATTER of a Complaint against Arthur Kitchin AND IN THE MATTER of a …
Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision
The Respondent attorney, Arthur Kitchin, was retained by Ruth Henry to handle the sale of her land for $1.8m. The full purchase price was paid to him, but after deducting costs of sale he paid over only $1m and failed to pay the balance or account for the funds for more than 8 years. He blamed illness and substance abuse, and during proceedings gave repeated assurances (which he failed to honour) that he held the balance and would produce a cheque. Applying the criminal standard of proof, the panel found the complaint proven and expressly found the Respondent had acted dishonestly and abused the trust reposed in him. He was struck off the Roll, ordered to pay restitution of $601,500.22 (balance plus 6% interest) with continuing 6% interest, plus costs of $30,000 to the Complainant and $60,000 to the General Legal Council.
Duties found breached:
- No taking unfair advantage
- Uphold public trust in the profession
- No conflict between current clients
- No improper use of client money
Aggravating factors:
- Failure to complete the transaction or pay over the balance for more than 8 years after being retained
- Gave solemn assurances during proceedings that he held the balance and would produce a cheque, but failed to do so
- Repeated absences from hearings
- Abuse of client trust
Mitigating factors:
- Acknowledged history of substance abuse partly responsible for the situation
- Recounted a kidnapping ordeal and post-traumatic stress affecting his ability to practice
- Expressed willingness to complete the matter and pay what was due
⚠ figures not found verbatim in the source were dropped: ["unverified_costs_amount=90000"]
Duties engaged
Other decisions involving this respondent
Matched by respondent name — may include a different person with the same name.
Documents
Source: https://www.generallegalcouncil.org/judgement/arthur-g-kitchin-complaint-no-132-of-2009/