Skip to main content
discipline 4 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Yvonne Shanti & Mayson Shanti

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number10237/2009
Date01/01/2009
OutcomeS.43 Order (clerks), Strike off

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Client Money, Criminal Convictions, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules, Others

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
Dishonesty foundYes

Yvonne Shanti, a sole practitioner solicitor, was found to have misappropriated client funds by paying out against uncleared cheques provided by her husband (the Second Respondent), leading to a minimum cash shortage of £38,782.41 and other client account shortfalls, failed to maintain proper accounting records, breached two undertakings, allowed misleading publicity, and acted in conflict of interest. The Tribunal found her dishonest on allegations 2 (misappropriation) and 5 (failure to fulfil undertakings). Her husband Mayson Shanti, a non-solicitor, was found dishonest for misappropriating client funds and holding himself out as a solicitor, and had a prior conviction for offences involving dishonesty. The First Respondent was struck off; the Second Respondent was made subject to a s.43 order. Costs were ordered against both (two-thirds/one-third split) subject to detailed assessment, with interim payments of £7,000 (First Respondent) and £3,500 (Second Respondent).

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Findings of dishonesty against both Respondents
  • First Respondent aware of husband's criminal history for dishonesty offences
  • Conflicting explanations damaging credibility
  • Manipulation of undertakings and use of other clients' funds
  • Second Respondent's prior conviction for incitement to obtain property by deception (four years imprisonment)
  • Prevarication and failure to produce accounting records to the IO

Mitigating factors:

  • First Respondent's practice management failures partly attributable to a dilatory bookkeeper and staff lacking knowledge of the Accounts Rules
  • First Respondent voluntarily closed the practice and cooperated in distributing files
  • Payments of approximately £93,000 introduced to reduce the client account shortfall

⚠ figures not found verbatim in the source were dropped: ["unverified_costs_amount=10500"]

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/10237/