Skip to main content
discipline 3 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

B H Grunfeld and R G C Thornton

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number8750/2003
Date01/01/2003
OutcomeReprimand, Suspend - Indefinite

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Client Money, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules, Others

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionSuspension
Dishonesty foundNo

Two solicitors faced conduct-unbefitting allegations arising from an OSS inspection of Grunfelds. The First Respondent (Grunfeld) admitted six Solicitors Accounts Rules breaches (allegations 2-8) and a s.41 breach relating to the employment of a struck-off solicitor (JH). Allegations of a money transmission service (1) and dishonesty in a misleading s.41 application (9) and knowingly employing JH without permission (10) were not proved; the Tribunal expressly found no dishonesty. He was suspended indefinitely and ordered to pay £4,000 costs. The Second Respondent (Thornton), who had taken over ill-health early, admitted failing to notify the Law Society he could no longer supervise JH; given his serious illness he was reprimanded and ordered to pay £500 agreed costs.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Serious Accounts Rules breaches committed over a substantial period
  • Failure to comply with conditions on employment of struck-off solicitor JH, placing the public at continuing and prolonged risk
  • Allowed JH to work in conveyancing (contrary to litigation-only condition) and to access clients' monies
  • First Respondent had written the conditions himself yet took no proper care to observe them
  • Second Respondent had a previous 1995 Tribunal appearance for Accounts Rules breaches

Mitigating factors:

  • First Respondent's admissions to allegations 2-8
  • Previous unblemished record of First Respondent
  • No client had lost money or complained
  • First Respondent's naivety and inexperience with accounts
  • Second Respondent's serious ill health and short involvement in the firm, with medical evidence

⚠ figures not found verbatim in the source were dropped: ["unverified_costs_amount=4500"]

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/8750/