No improper questioning of witnesses court
As advocate the lawyer must not ask questions or make statements merely to insult, humiliate, vilify or annoy a witness, and must give a cross-examinable witness the chance to answer serious allegations.
How the codes express this duty
E&W Solicitors SRA Principles & Code no clear equivalent
E&W Barristers BSB Handbook rC7.1; rC7.2 strong 2 cases
rC7.1 you must not make statements or ask questions merely to insult, humiliate or annoy a witness or any other person; .2 you must not make a serious allegation against a witness whom you have had an opportunity to cross-examine unless you have given that witness a chance to answer the allegation in cross-examination;
BSB Handbook · current · archived copy · official source ↗
Cayman Islands Legal Services Code 2026 R.2.5(a); R.2.5(b) strong
make statements or ask questions merely to insult, humiliate or annoy a witness or any other person or which exploit, or attempt to exploit, the vulnerability of a witness or any other person; make a serious allegation against a witness whom the attorney-at-law has had an opportunity to cross-examine unless the attorney-at-law has given that witness a chance to answer the allegation in cross-examination
Cayman Islands Legal Services Code of Professional Conduct · 2026 · archived copy
AU Solicitors Solicitors' Conduct Rules Rules 21.2; 21.8.1 partial 3 cases
21.2 A solicitor must take care to ensure that decisions by the solicitor to make allegations or suggestions under privilege against any person: 21.2.1 are reasonably justified by the material then available to the solicitor; 21.2.2 are appropriate for the robust advancement of the client's case on its merits; and 21.2.3 are not made principally in order to harass or embarrass a person. 21.8 Without limiting the generality of Rule 21.2, in proceedings in which an allegation of domestic or family violence, sexual assault, indecent assault or the commission of an act of indecency is made and in which the alleged victim gives evidence: 21.8.1 a solicitor must not ask that witness a question or pursue a line of questioning of that witness which is intended: (i) to mislead or confuse the witness; or (ii) to be unduly annoying, harassing, intimidating, offensive, oppressive, humiliating or repetitive.
Australian Solicitors' Conduct Rules · 2015 (June 2026 compilation) · archived copy · official source ↗
AU Barristers Uniform Barristers Rules rr60-61 partial
A barrister must take care to ensure that decisions by the barrister to make allegations or suggestions under privilege against any person: (a) are reasonably justified by the material then available to the barrister; (b) are appropriate for the robust advancement of the client's case on its merits; and (c) are not made principally in order to harass or embarrass a person. Without limiting the generality of Rule 60, in proceedings in which an allegation of sexual assault, indecent assault or the commission of an act of indecency is made and in which the alleged victim gives evidence: (a) a barrister must not ask that witness a question or pursue a line of questioning of that witness which is intended: (i) to mislead or confuse the witness; or (ii) to be unduly annoying, harassing, intimidating, offensive, oppressive, humiliating or repetitive; and (b) a barrister must take into account any particular vulnerability of the witness in the manner and tone of the questions that the barrister asks.
Legal Profession Uniform Conduct (Barristers) Rules · 2015 (as amended 14 May 2025) · archived copy · official source ↗
IE Solicitors Law Society Guide Ch5 — The solicitor advocate, para 4 strong
It is the duty of an advocate to guard against being made the channel of questions that are only intended to degrade the other side, a witness, or any other person. They are under a duty to exercise their own judgement both regarding the substance and the form of a question.
Solicitor's Guide to Professional Conduct (Law Society of Ireland) · 4th ed. (2022) · archived copy · official source ↗
IE Barristers Bar Code of Conduct Rule 5.18 strong
Barristers when conducting a case must not make statements or ask questions which are merely scandalous or are intended only for the purpose of vilifying, insulting or annoying a witness or some other person.
Code of Conduct for the Bar of Ireland · 2024 · archived copy · official source ↗
JM Attorneys Canons of Professional Ethics no clear equivalent
JE Lawyers Law Society of Jersey Code R.3.5 a)-b) strong
Members must not: a) make statements or ask questions merely to insult, humiliate or annoy a witness or any other person or which exploit, or attempt to exploit, the vulnerability of a witness or any other person; b) make a serious allegation against a witness whom they have had an opportunity to cross-examine unless they have given that witness a chance to answer the allegation in cross-examination.
Law Society of Jersey Code of Conduct · 1 January 2017 · archived copy · official source ↗
ON Lawyers LSO Rules of Prof. Conduct r 5.1-2(m) strong
When acting as an advocate, a lawyer shall not ... needlessly abuse, hector, or harass a witness
Law Society of Ontario — Rules of Professional Conduct · current · archived copy · official source ↗
BC Lawyers BC Code r 5.1-2(m),(o) strong
When acting as an advocate, a lawyer must not: ... (m) abuse, hector or harass a witness; ... (o) needlessly inconvenience a witness;
Code of Professional Conduct for British Columbia (BC Code) · 2017 · archived copy · official source ↗
NZ Lawyers Conduct & Client Care Rules r 13.10.3 / r 13.10.5 strong
A lawyer must not put questions regarding allegations against third parties to a witness when the lawyer knows that the witness does not have the necessary information or knowledge ... A lawyer must not treat a witness or potential witness in an overbearing or misleading way and if asked must inform a witness or potential witness of his or her right to decline to be interviewed.
Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008 · SR 2008/214 · archived copy · official source ↗
SCO Solicitors LSS Standards of Conduct no clear equivalent
SG Lawyers Professional Conduct Rules 2015 r 12 (Communications and dealings with witnesses) partial
12 Communications and dealings with witnesses
Legal Profession (Professional Conduct) Rules 2015 · 2015 · archived copy · official source ↗
HK Solicitors Solicitors' Guide Principle 10.07 Commentary 3 strong
A solicitor must not make or instruct a barrister to make an allegation which is intended only to insult, degrade or annoy the other side, a witness or any other person.
Hong Kong Solicitors' Guide to Professional Conduct (Volume 1) · current · archived copy · official source ↗
HK Barristers Bar Code of Conduct para 10.43 strong
A practising barrister must not make submissions impugning a witness whom he has had an opportunity to cross-examine unless in cross-examination he has given the witness an opportunity to answer the allegation.
Code of Conduct of the Bar of the Hong Kong SAR · 2018 · archived copy · official source ↗
Cases dealing with this duty
6 decisions · link basis: found breached = a tribunal finding; rule cited = the mapped provision is cited in the decision; text match = high-precision text pattern
-
O'Loughlin, Jonathan Edward
<p>1: The Respondent Solicitor engaged in discourteous conduct in breach Rule 21.2 of the Legal Profession Uniform Law Australian Solicitors’ Conduct Rules (Conduct Rules)</p><p>2: The Respondent Solicitor breached Rule…
An apology from the Respondent Solicitor to be made to the Complainant within six months in a form that is approved by the Director, Legal Regulation (s 299(1)(c) of the Uniform Law); $0.00 About About the OLSC The Commissioner History Mission statement Structure Contact Contact the OLSC Give us your feedback: online surveys Access to information (GIPAA) Community information Information for lawyers Fact sheets FAQs Other regulatory and complaint-handling organisations Contact LawAccess NSW for legal information " You and Your Lawyer", Hot Topics 78 Legal Information Access Centre (LIAC), State Library of NSW , provides access to information about the law in NSW regarding your lawyer Privacy Copyright and Disclaimer Website accessibility -
Hughes, Owen Maldwyn
<p>Allegation 1 - The Lawyer engaged in sexual harassment and / or workplace bullying in breach of Rule 42 of the Legal Profession Uniform Law Australian Solicitors’ Conduct Rules 2015 (“the Solicitors’ Rules”)</p><p>Fu…
Reprimand $0.00 About About the OLSC The Commissioner History Mission statement Structure Contact Contact the OLSC Give us your feedback: online surveys Access to information (GIPAA) Community information Information for lawyers Fact sheets FAQs Other regulatory and complaint-handling organisations Contact LawAccess NSW for legal information " You and Your Lawyer", Hot Topics 78 Legal Information Access Centre (LIAC), State Library of NSW , provides access to information about the law in NSW regarding your lawyer Privacy Copyright and Disclaimer Website accessibility -
Nehme, Christopher
<p>Contravened Rule 21.4 of the Legal Profession Uniform Law Australian Solicitors’ Conduct Rules.(<span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">Responsible use of court process and privilege)</span></p> — Unsatisfactory Professio…
Reprimand $0.00 About About the OLSC The Commissioner History Mission statement Structure Contact Contact the OLSC Give us your feedback: online surveys Access to information (GIPAA) Community information Information for lawyers Fact sheets FAQs Other regulatory and complaint-handling organisations Contact LawAccess NSW for legal information " You and Your Lawyer", Hot Topics 78 Legal Information Access Centre (LIAC), State Library of NSW , provides access to information about the law in NSW regarding your lawyer Privacy Copyright and Disclaimer Website accessibility -
Paul Francis Fallon
Breaches, Client Money, Failures, Others, Solicitors' Accounts Rules
Strike off 1 PDF -
Final 1 PDF
-
Final 1 PDF
Duty classification does not yet cover every jurisdiction (Ontario, New Zealand and Singapore decisions are indexed but not yet duty-classified), so counts here understate those corpora.