Bradley Munt
Allegation / charges
Guilty of professional misconduct with respect to charges 1, 6, 10, 12, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26 and 28. Guilty of professional misconduct with respect to charges 2, 5, 9, 11, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25, 27. Guilty of unsatisfactory professional conduct with respect to charges 3 and 13. Guilty of unsatisfactory professional conduct with respect to charges 7 and 8. Guilty of professional misconduct with respect to charge 14.
Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision
The practitioner was found guilty of professional misconduct on numerous charges (1, 2, 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28) and of unsatisfactory professional conduct on charges 3, 7, 8 and 13. The provided text contains no express finding of dishonesty and does not state any sanction, fine, or costs.
Duties found breached:
⚠ figures not found verbatim in the source were dropped: ["extracted_from_register_summary"]
Duties engaged
Documents
Source: https://www.lsc.qld.gov.au/queensland-discipline-register