§ discipline
‹ Back

Andrew James Cameron Banfill

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number10316-2009
Date01/01/1970
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Client Money, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
CostsGBP 67,500
Dishonesty foundYes

Andrew James Cameron Banfill, a Member of OBG Cameron Banfill LLP, faced allegations following the firm's collapse and intervention in March 2009. The Tribunal, proceeding in his absence after refusing an adjournment, found all but one allegation (failure to comply with practising certificate condition) substantiated beyond reasonable doubt. The firm went into meltdown leaving clients abandoned. Banfill made improper withdrawals from client account, including £110,000 (29 Oct 2008) subject to a POCA Restraint Order with post-dated invoices, and £50,000 (5 Jan 2009) due to a third party under an undertaking, with funds diverted to his personal US bank account. Applying the Twinsectra test, the Tribunal found his conduct dishonest. With no exceptional circumstances under Sharma, he was struck off the Roll and ordered to pay costs of £67,500.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Dishonesty involving misappropriation of client funds for personal benefit
  • Removal of funds subject to a Proceeds of Crime Act Restraint Order (potential criminal offence/contempt)
  • Funds transferred to personal US bank account
  • Failure to remedy known shortfalls on client account
  • Minimum unverified cash shortage of approximately £400,869
  • Failure to engage with proceedings

Mitigating factors:

  • No previous disciplinary matters

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/10316-2009-10850-2011/