§ discipline
‹ Browse decisions

Omer Mian

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number11919/2019
Date01/01/2019
OutcomeS.43 Order (clerks)

Allegation / charges

Criminal Convictions

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionConditions
CostsGBP 4,086
Dishonesty foundNo

The Respondent, an unadmitted individual employed as a legal cashier and operating his own bookkeeping business (TWM Associates), was convicted in 2017 of Conspiracy to Defraud and sentenced to 29 months imprisonment for providing fraudulent employment references and certifying mortgage applications for individuals he had never met. The Tribunal found the section 43 allegation proved beyond reasonable doubt and made a section 43 order to protect the public. It declined to impose a fine because the criminal activity was unconnected to his work at the firm, there was no detriment to clients, and he had already served a custodial sentence. The Tribunal made no express finding of dishonesty in the disciplinary proceedings. Costs were reduced from the £6,086.37 claimed to £4,086.37, as the case had initially been put on a misplaced basis and the Respondent succeeded on the disputed fine issue.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Serious criminal offence reflected in length of custodial sentence (29 months)

Mitigating factors:

  • Criminal activity and conviction unconnected to his work in the firm
  • No detriment to clients of the firm
  • Custodial sentence already served (released January 2019)
  • Guilty plea in the Crown Court
  • Did not oppose the section 43 order
  • Difficult financial circumstances

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/11919/