Richard Markham Thompson

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

Two partners of T & L Solicitors faced charges arising from improper transfers of client money to office accounts to prop up the firm and to pay the First Respondent's and Second Respondent's personal HMRC tax liabilities. The Tribunal found all allegations proved beyond reasonable doubt. The First Respondent (Thompson) was found to have acted dishonestly (Twinsectra test) on allegations 1.2-1.5 and was struck off, ordered to pay costs of £17,293.18 (75%). The Second Respondent was found strictly liable for the SAR breaches as a partner but not dishonest; he was fined £10,000 and ordered to pay costs of £5,764.39 (25%). Total costs claimed £23,057.57.

Duties found breached:

• Proper basis for allegations
• No taking unfair advantage
• Uphold public trust in the profession
• No improper use of client money
• Prompt accounting and return of money

Aggravating factors:

• Proven dishonesty arising from misuse of client money
• Serious and continuing misconduct that was deliberate, planned and calculated
• Personal gain - used client money to pay personal tax liability
• Abuse of position of trust as guardian of client money
• Extensive experience as a solicitor - knew conduct breached obligations

Mitigating factors:

• First Respondent: previously unblemished career; cooperated with investigation; repaid the improperly taken funds
• Second Respondent: acted quickly to remedy situation and ensure no client loss; contributed £57,000 personally and cashed in pension; demonstrated insight; cooperated; no further breaches under his stewardship; reliance on First Respondent for financial management