Skip to main content
discipline 4 October 2026

The duty in context

No bribery or improper gifts integrity

The lawyer must ensure any gift or benefit complies with bribery, corruption and gift rules and must not give anything of value to a judge, juror or tribunal official in a pending matter.

917 cases 74% strike-off 1 with dishonesty finding

How the codes express this duty

E&W Solicitors SRA Principles & Code CCS 2.3; Principle 2 partial 900 cases
2.3 You do not provide or offer to provide any benefit to witnesses dependent upon the nature of their evidence or the outcome of the case. 1.2 in a way that upholds public trust and confidence in the solicitors' profession and in legal services provided by authorised persons.
E&W Barristers BSB Handbook gC18; gC19; gC30.2 partial 1 case
gC18 The following may reasonably be seen as compromising your independence in breach of Rule 8 ... .1 offering, promising or giving: .a any commission or referral fee ... or .b a gift (apart from items of modest value), to any client, professional client or other intermediary; gC30 ... .2 whether in a private or publicly funded case, a referral fee to which the client has not consented may constitute a bribe and therefore a criminal offence under the Bribery Act 2010;
Cayman Islands Legal Services Code 2026 R.7.9; R.10.1 strong
An attorney-at-law shall ensure that any gratuitous benefit received from a client, whether monetary or non-monetary, is compliant with applicable legislation on bribery and corruption, and any other regulation applicable to attorneys-at-law and recognised law entities in respect of gifts.
AU Solicitors Solicitors' Conduct Rules no clear equivalent
AU Barristers Uniform Barristers Rules r45 partial 7 cases
A barrister may not give a commission or gift to any person by reason of or in connection with the introduction of professional work by that person to the barrister.
IE Solicitors Law Society Guide Ch3 — Prohibition on payments to clients; Ch6 — Inducements partial
A solicitor should not, directly, or indirectly, make or offer to make any payment to or on behalf of any person as an inducement to obtain or retain instructions... A solicitor must not encourage or offer inducements to any third party with a view to obtaining instructions from any person.
IE Barristers Bar Code of Conduct no clear equivalent
JM Attorneys Canons of Professional Ethics Canon V(h) strong
An Attorney shall not give, lend or promise anything of value to a Judge, juror or official of a tribunal before which there is a pending matter in which he is engaged.
JE Lawyers Law Society of Jersey Code R.6.9 partial
This Rule applies alongside, and is without prejudice to, applicable legislation on bribery and corruption, and the requirement on a firm to keep a register of gifts.
ON Lawyers LSO Rules of Prof. Conduct r 5.1-2(d) partial
When acting as an advocate, a lawyer shall not ... endeavour or allow anyone else to endeavour, directly or indirectly, to influence the decision or action of a tribunal or any of its officials in any case or matter by any means other than open persuasion as an advocate
BC Lawyers BC Code r 5.1-2(d) partial 1 case
When acting as an advocate, a lawyer must not: ... (d) endeavour or allow anyone else to endeavour, directly or indirectly, to influence the decision or action of a tribunal or any of its officials in any case or matter by any means other than open persuasion as an advocate;
NZ Lawyers Conduct & Client Care Rules r 5.9 partial
A lawyer must not directly or indirectly offer to, or receive from, a third party any reward or inducement in respect of any advice given, referrals made, products or services purchased, or any work done for a client.
SCO Solicitors LSS Standards of Conduct no clear equivalent
SG Lawyers Professional Conduct Rules 2015 no clear equivalent
HK Solicitors Solicitors' Guide no clear equivalent
HK Barristers Bar Code of Conduct para 10.10 partial
A practising barrister must not give a commission or present or make any payment (other than a payment for practice promotion permitted by this Code) to any person for the purposes of procuring professional instructions or rewarding the giving or introduction of professional instructions.

Cases dealing with this duty

Clear

917 decisions · link basis: found breached = a tribunal finding; rule cited = the mapped provision is cited in the decision; text match = high-precision text pattern

  • Muhammad Nazar Hayat
    SDT solicitor 12621/2024 2025-08-29 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, SRA Principles 2019

    Not Proved/Dismissed 1 PDF View decision
  • Alison Haley Griffiths
    SDT solicitor 12759/2025 2025-08-29 rule cited

    Breaches, Client Money, Code of Conduct 2011, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Criminal Convictions, Dishonesty, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Christopher James Fry
    SDT solicitor 12714/2024 2025-08-29 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, Recklessness, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Michael Peter Goodwin
    SDT solicitor 12726/2025 2025-08-29 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, SRA Principles 2019

    Suspend - Fixed Period 1 PDF View decision
  • Elizabeth Oruene Ikiriko
    SDT solicitor 12696/2024 2025-08-28 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Recklessness, SRA Principles 2019

    Suspend - Fixed Period 1 PDF View decision
  • Laura Elizabeth Simpson
    SDT solicitor 12711/2024 2025-08-22 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Christopher James Hawkes
    SDT solicitor 12571/2024 2025-08-22 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • (unnamed)
    SDT solicitor 12740/2025 2025-08-22 rule cited
    Variation of Conditions on Practising Certificate 1 PDF View decision
  • Natasha Janet Dionne Fairs
    SDT solicitor 12741/2025 2025-08-22 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • (unnamed)
    SDT solicitor 12735/2025 2025-08-22 rule cited
    S.44E/ S.46/Paragraph 14C Appeals 1 PDF View decision
  • Mohammed Sarfraz
    SDT solicitor 12682/2024 2025-08-22 rule cited

    Breaches, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

    Suspended period of Suspension 1 PDF View decision
  • Nigel John Weller
    SDT solicitor 12693/2024 2025-08-22 rule cited

    Breaches, Client Money, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2019, SRA Principles 2019

    Reprimand 1 PDF View decision
  • Elizabeth Jane Radcliffe
    SDT solicitor 12700/2024 2025-08-22 rule cited

    Breaches, Client Money, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2019, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

    Suspend - Fixed Period 1 PDF View decision
  • Jonathan Peter Durkin
    SDT solicitor 12734/2025 2025-08-22 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Recklessness, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

    Suspend - Fixed Period 1 PDF View decision
  • Yusuf Jamal Siddiqui
    SDT solicitor 12637/2024 2025-08-22 rule cited

    Breaches, Client Money, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2019, SRA Principles 2019

    Suspend - Fixed Period 1 PDF View decision
  • Tapfumanei Nyawanza
    SDT solicitor 12713/2024 2025-08-22 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct 2011, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Alison Clare Banerjee
    SDT solicitor 12722/2025 2025-08-01 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Harry Francis Cottam
    SDT solicitor 12336/2022 2025-07-31 rule cited

    Dishonesty, Lack of Integrity, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2011, SRA Principles 2011

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • (unnamed)
    SDT solicitor 12723/2025 2025-07-25 rule cited
    Restoration to the Roll - Refused 1 PDF View decision
  • Matthew Stephen Becker
    SDT solicitor 12692/2024 2025-07-25 rule cited

    Breaches, Client Money, Code of Conduct 2011, Dishonesty, Lack of Integrity, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2011, SRA Principles 2011

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Daniel James Skinner
    SDT solicitor 12636/2024 2025-07-25 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct 2011, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, Lack of Integrity, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Alejandro Emilio Verdu Haro
    SDT solicitor 12705/2024 2025-07-25 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct 2011, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • William Joseph Harris
    SDT solicitor 12738/2025 2025-07-25 rule cited

    Breaches, Client Money, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, Lack of Integrity, Money Laundering Regulations, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2019, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Rory Peter Heddle Fordyce
    SDT solicitor 12560/2024 2025-07-25 rule cited

    Breaches, Client Money, Code of Conduct 2011, Money Laundering Regulations, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2011, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2019, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

    Fine 1 PDF View decision
  • Stuart Cottis
    SDT solicitor 12706/2024 2025-07-25 rule cited

    Breaches, Criminal Convictions, Lack of Integrity, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision

Duty classification does not yet cover every jurisdiction (Ontario, New Zealand and Singapore decisions are indexed but not yet duty-classified), so counts here understate those corpora.