The duty in context
No improper communication with the court court
The lawyer must not communicate with the court on a matter of substance in the opponent's absence except where permitted, and must promptly disclose to the opponent any such communication.
How the codes express this duty
E&W Solicitors SRA Principles & Code no clear equivalent
E&W Barristers BSB Handbook no clear equivalent
Cayman Islands Legal Services Code 2026 no clear equivalent
AU Solicitors Solicitors' Conduct Rules Rules 22.5; 22.6 strong 110 cases
22.5 A solicitor must not, outside an ex parte application or a hearing of which an opponent has had proper notice, communicate in the opponent's absence with the court concerning any matter of substance in connection with current proceedings unless: ... 22.6 A solicitor must promptly tell the opponent what passes between the solicitor and a court in a communication referred to in Rule 22.5.
Australian Solicitors' Conduct Rules · 2015 (June 2026 compilation) · archived copy · official source ↗
AU Barristers Uniform Barristers Rules rr53-54 strong 50 cases
A barrister must not, outside an ex parte application or a hearing of which an opponent has had proper notice, communicate in the opponent's absence with the court concerning any matter of substance in connection with current proceedings unless [permitted]. A barrister must promptly tell an opponent what passes between the barrister and a court in a communication referred to in Rule 53.
Legal Profession Uniform Conduct (Barristers) Rules · 2015 (as amended 14 May 2025) · archived copy · official source ↗
IE Solicitors Law Society Guide Ch5 — Communication with the court strong 83 cases
A solicitor should not discuss the merits of a case with the judge, registrar, clerk or other official before whom a case is pending. Where during the case a written communication to the court is required, the solicitor should deliver a copy of the communication to the opposing party.
Solicitor's Guide to Professional Conduct (Law Society of Ireland) · 4th ed. (2022) · archived copy · official source ↗
IE Barristers Bar Code of Conduct Rule 5.28; Rule 5.29 strong 83 cases
Barristers shall not approach a Judge to discuss with them any matter then pending or at hearing before that Judge without the consent of the Judge and their opposing lawyer or lay litigant being present during such approach.
Code of Conduct for the Bar of Ireland · 2024 · archived copy · official source ↗
JM Attorneys Canons of Professional Ethics Canon V(i) partial 38 cases
In any proceeding in a Court an Attorney shall not communicate or cause any other person to communicate with a juror as to the merits of such proceedings, and shall only do so with a Judge or person exercising Judicial functions:- (i) in the normal course of the proceedings, or (ii) where authorised by law, or the practice of the Courts or with the consent of the parties.
Legal Profession (Canons of Professional Ethics) Rules · 1978 (principal) · archived copy · official source ↗
JE Lawyers Law Society of Jersey Code G.3.4 partial
Members must not discuss the merits of a case with a member of the judiciary before whom a case is pending or by whom it may be heard unless invited to do so in the presence of the lawyer for the other side.
Law Society of Jersey Code of Conduct · 1 January 2017 · archived copy · official source ↗
ON Lawyers LSO Rules of Prof. Conduct r 5.1-2(d) partial
When acting as an advocate, a lawyer shall not ... endeavour or allow anyone else to endeavour, directly or indirectly, to influence the decision or action of a tribunal or any of its officials in any case or matter by any means other than open persuasion as an advocate
Law Society of Ontario — Rules of Professional Conduct · current · archived copy · official source ↗
BC Lawyers BC Code r 2.1-2(d) partial 24 cases
A lawyer should never seek privately to influence a court or tribunal, directly or indirectly, in the lawyer's or a client's favour, nor should the lawyer attempt to curry favour with juries by fawning, flattery or pretended solicitude for their personal comfort.
Code of Professional Conduct for British Columbia (BC Code) · 2017 · archived copy · official source ↗
NZ Lawyers Conduct & Client Care Rules r 13.2.2 strong
A lawyer must not discuss any case or matter before the court with any judicial officer involved in the proceeding either formally or informally outside of the rules of procedure ... In cases of doubt, the lawyers for other parties (or if a party is not represented, then the party concerned) should be informed of any matters being brought before the court.
Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008 · SR 2008/214 · archived copy · official source ↗
SCO Solicitors LSS Standards of Conduct no clear equivalent
SG Lawyers Professional Conduct Rules 2015 r 30 (Communication with court) partial 10 cases
30 Communication with court
Legal Profession (Professional Conduct) Rules 2015 · 2015 · archived copy · official source ↗
HK Solicitors Solicitors' Guide Principle 10.02 Commentary 2-3 strong
Except in the course of an application to the court, a solicitor must not discuss the merits of the case with a judge, magistrate or other adjudicator before whom a case is pending ... unless invited to do so in the presence of the solicitor or barrister for the other side ... a solicitor shall at the same time deliver a copy of it to his professional adversary.
Hong Kong Solicitors' Guide to Professional Conduct (Volume 1) · current · archived copy · official source ↗
HK Barristers Bar Code of Conduct para 10.48 strong
A practising barrister must not, outside of an ex parte application or a hearing of which an opponent has had proper notice, communicate in the opponent's absence with the Court concerning any matter of substance in connection with current proceedings unless ... A practising barrister must promptly inform an opponent of what has passed between the barrister and the Court in a communication referred to in sub-paragraph (a) hereof.
Code of Conduct of the Bar of the Hong Kong SAR · 2018 · archived copy · official source ↗
Cases dealing with this duty
753 decisions · link basis: found breached = a tribunal finding; rule cited = the mapped provision is cited in the decision; text match = high-precision text pattern
-
-
Paul Gordon Crawford
Between 2022 and 2024, while acting for clients in the South Australian Employment Tribunal, the Practitioner failed to meet the standard of competence and diligence expected of a legal practitioner when he: • failed to…
Multiple Disciplinary Action Conditions on Practising Certificate Reprimand Undertake training, education or counselling View decision -
Kamaljit Singh Grewal
Rule 3-7.1 Consent Agreement
-
-
Sarinjit Singh Bahia
Account Rules breaches, Code of Conduct 2011, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, Lack of Integrity, Misappropriation of Client Account, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2019, SRA Principles 2011, S…
-
Raymond John McKeeve
Code of Conduct 2011, SRA Principles 2011
-
John Kishin Navani
Breaches, Code of Conduct 2011
-
Nicole Tam
Rule 3-7.1 Consent Agreement
-
Maame Adjoa Djan-Krofa
Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, SRA Principles 2019
-
Darren Paul Kruse
Between February 2021 and March 2022, the Practitioner failed to act on client instructions and respond to client correspondence, in breach of the following South Australian Legal Practitioners Conduct Rules: • to act i…
Multiple Disciplinary Action Fine Order to apologise Reprimand View decision -
Darren Paul Kruse
Between August 2021 and November 2021, the Practitioner failed to act on client instructions and respond to client correspondence, in breach of the following South Australian Legal Practitioners Conduct Rules: • to act …
Multiple Disciplinary Action Fine Order to apologise Reprimand View decision -
Darren Paul Kruse
The Practitioner agreed to produce an affidavit as to the provenance of a Will and codicil to enable an Application for Probate. The Practitioner failed to produce that affidavit and respond to correspondence in breach …
Multiple Disciplinary Action Fine Order to apologise Reprimand View decision -
Darren Paul Kruse
Between December 2020 and March 2021, the Practitioner failed to act on client instructions and respond to client correspondence, in breach of the following South Australian Legal Practitioners Conduct Rules: • to act i…
Multiple Disciplinary Action Fine Order to apologise Reprimand View decision -
Shafiq-ul Hassan
Breaches, Code of Conduct 2011, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019
-
Priyank Tanwar
Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, SRA Principles 2019
-
Anthony James Vincent Kerin
1. Persistent, lengthy and inexplicable delays in providing legal services, in breach of the following South Australian Legal Practitioners Conduct Rules: • to act in the best interest of their client (Rule 4.1.1); • to…
Multiple Disciplinary Action Order to apologise Other Reprimand Undertake training, education or counselling View decision -
Lance Rigley
In respect of each charge there is a finding of professional misconduct
-
Debby-Ann Samuels
Suspended | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered December 12, 2025. || Guilty of Professional Misconduct | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered April 14, 2025. View PDF SANCTION DECISION OF THE DISCIPLINARY CO…
-
-
(unnamed)
Client Money, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Money Laundering Regulations, Solicitors' Accounts Rules
-
Brenton John Miegel
Delayed administering a deceased estate for 10 years which diminished the public’s confidence in the administration of justice and brought the profession into disrepute. Failed to respond adequately and in a timely mann…
Multiple Disciplinary Action Conditions on Practising Certificate Fine Make a payment Refrain from doing something Reprimand View decision -
Grubisa, Dominique
Proceedings no. 2022/00387737 (First Application) 1. Mrs Grubisa was the principal of a law practice which had lay associates who were disqualified persons under the Legal Profession Uniform Law (NSW) and who were not a…
Costs Order recommending removal of lawyer's name from the Roll of Australian Lawyers $0.00 1 PDF View decision -
-
-
Duty classification does not yet cover every jurisdiction (Ontario, New Zealand and Singapore decisions are indexed but not yet duty-classified), so counts here understate those corpora.