Skip to main content
discipline 3 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Stephen Allan Lawson

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number11372/2015
Date01/01/2015
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
CostsGBP 23,000
Dishonesty foundNo

Stephen Allan Lawson, a solicitor and former partner at Hunton and Garget, admitted breaching the Solicitors Accounts Rules by making three improper withdrawals from client account totalling £6,940.60 (one to benefit another client and two for his own benefit), and admitted preparing false and misleading cheque stubs, estate accounts and letters to beneficiary charities, and failing to uphold the rule of law. Dishonesty was alleged but not admitted; given his admissions and medical evidence, the Tribunal accepted it was not proportionate or in the public interest to pursue the dishonesty allegations, which were left to lie on file. No express finding of dishonesty was made. The Tribunal found allegations 1.1-1.3 proved (save dishonesty) and, by agreement of the parties, struck him off the Roll and ordered him to pay £23,000 costs.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Created a shortfall on client account of £6,940.60 through three improper withdrawals
  • Wrote false and misleading cheque stubs, estate accounts and letters to beneficiary charities
  • Took client money for his own benefit
  • Prepared and obtained a signature to a materially incorrect witness statement, amounting to potential interference with a witness
  • Conduct concealed a mistake and covered up wrongdoing

Mitigating factors:

  • No previous disciplinary history
  • Long-standing mental health condition affecting his professional conduct from around 2006
  • Genuine remorse and apology
  • Numerous positive character references
  • Cooperation and admissions to serious allegations
  • No desire to remain in the profession

⚠ figures not found verbatim in the source were dropped: ["review_dishonesty_finding_cue_present"]

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/11372/