Skip to main content
discipline 3 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

D P O'Neill

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number10950/2012
Date01/01/2012
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Client Money, Failures, Others, Solicitors' Accounts Rules

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
CostsGBP 17,451
Dishonesty foundNo

David Phillip O'Neill, sole director of Cartwright Adams Solicitors, allowed Inderjit Singh Pal Nijher (Mr Singh), a solicitor struck off for dishonesty, to control and operate the firm's client and office accounts, recruit and supervise staff, and pay himself. Client monies of £35,773.64 were withdrawn from client account for unauthorised payments, misleading ledger entries and attendance notes were created, and improper transfers were made without bills. The Respondent admitted nine allegations (breaches of the Code of Conduct 2007, Solicitors' Accounts Rules 1998, and Section 41 Solicitors Act 1974). The Tribunal did not find dishonesty (the subjective limb of the Twinsectra test was not met beyond reasonable doubt) but found the Respondent grossly reckless. He was struck off the Roll and ordered to pay costs of £17,451.43.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Enabled a solicitor struck off for dishonesty to control and manage a firm holding client funds, exposing profession and public to immense risk
  • Course of conduct continued over a lengthy period and was not spontaneous
  • Aware from November 2009 that Mr Singh was struck off yet did nothing
  • Total dereliction of duties as a solicitor
  • Entered into a partnership deed with Mr Singh less than a month after learning of the strike off
  • Found to have been grossly reckless

Mitigating factors:

  • Medical condition and psychiatric evidence submitted
  • No personal gain from the misconduct
  • Cooperated with the SRA investigation
  • Felt controlled by Mr Singh and became homeless
  • No previous disciplinary matters
  • Expressed shame and remorse

⚠ figures not found verbatim in the source were dropped: ["review_dishonesty_finding_cue_present"]

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/10950/