Skip to main content
discipline 30 September 2026

The duty in context

Act in the client's best interests client

The lawyer must fearlessly promote and protect each client's best interests by all proper and lawful means, without regard to their own interests or adverse consequences to themselves.

647 cases 69% strike-off avg suspension 20.8 mo avg fine 28,615 183 with dishonesty finding

How the codes express this duty

E&W Solicitors SRA Principles & Code Principle 7 strong 558 cases
You act: 1.7 in the best interests of each client.
E&W Barristers BSB Handbook CD2; rC15.1; rC15.2; rC15.3 strong 8 cases
CD2 You must act in the best interests of each client. rC15 ... .1 you must promote fearlessly and by all proper and lawful means the client's best interests; .2 you must do so without regard to your own interests or to any consequences to you ...; .3 you must do so without regard to the consequences to any other person (whether to your professional client, employer or any other person);
Cayman Islands Legal Services Code 2026 P.4; R.6.1(a) strong
Attorneys-at-law shall act in the best interests of their clients... promote fearlessly, and by all proper and lawful means, the client's best interests without regard to — (i) the attorney-at-law's own interests or to any consequences to the attorney-at law; (ii) the consequences to any other person
AU Solicitors Solicitors' Conduct Rules Rule 4.1.1 strong 28 cases
A solicitor must also: 4.1.1 act in the best interests of a client in any matter in which the solicitor represents the client.
AU Barristers Uniform Barristers Rules r37 strong 4 cases
A barrister must promote and protect fearlessly and by all proper and lawful means the client's best interests to the best of the barrister's skill and diligence, and do so without regard to his or her own interest or to any consequences to the barrister or to any other person.
IE Solicitors Law Society Guide Ch5 — General (relationship with the court), para (a) strong
Should promote and protect by all proper and lawful means, without fear or favour, the client's best interests.
IE Barristers Bar Code of Conduct Rule 2.6; Rule 3.1 strong
Barristers must promote and protect fearlessly and by all proper and lawful means their client's best interests and do so without regard to their own interest or to any consequences for themselves or to any other person including fellow members of the legal profession.
JM Attorneys Canons of Professional Ethics Canon IV; Canon IV(c) strong 28 cases
AN ATTORNEY SHALL ACT IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF HIS CLIENT AND REPRESENT HIM HONESTLY, COMPETENTLY AND ZEALOUSLY WITHIN THE BOUNDS OF THE LAW. ... (c) An Attorney shall exercise independent judgment within the bounds of the law and the ethics of the profession for the benefit of his client.
JE Lawyers Law Society of Jersey Code P.4; R.5.1 a)-b) strong
Members must act in the best interests of their clients... Members must: a) promote fearlessly, and by all proper and lawful means, the client's best interests; b) do so without regard to their own interests or to any consequences to them.
ON Lawyers LSO Rules of Prof. Conduct r 5.1-1 commentary [1]; r 3.4-1 commentary [2] strong
In adversarial proceedings, the lawyer has a duty to the client to raise fearlessly every issue, advance every argument and ask every question, however distasteful, that the lawyer thinks will help the client's case and to endeavour to obtain for the client the benefit of every remedy and defence authorized by law. [3.4-1 cmt 2: the law imposes other duties on the lawyer, particularly the duty of loyalty. The duty of confidentiality, the duty of candour and the duty of commitment to the client's cause are aspects of the duty of loyalty.]
BC Lawyers BC Code r 2.1-3(e) strong 1 case
A lawyer should endeavour by all fair and honourable means to obtain for a client the benefit of any and every remedy and defence that is authorized by law. The lawyer must, however, steadfastly bear in mind that this great trust is to be performed within and not without the bounds of the law.
NZ Lawyers Conduct & Client Care Rules r 6 strong
In acting for a client, a lawyer must, within the bounds of the law and these rules, protect and promote the interests of the client to the exclusion of the interests of third parties.
SCO Solicitors LSS Standards of Conduct B1.4 strong 21 cases
You must act in the best interests of your clients subject to preserving your independence and complying with the law, these rules and the principles of good professional conduct.
SG Lawyers Professional Conduct Rules 2015 r 4(b) partial 2 cases
A legal practitioner’s duty to the legal practitioner’s client is subject only to the legal practitioner’s duty to the court, and must at all times be fulfilled in a manner that upholds the standing and integrity of the Singapore legal system and the legal profession in Singapore.
HK Solicitors Solicitors' Guide Principle 7.02 / r 2(c) Solicitors' Practice Rules strong
A solicitor must act in the best interest of his client and he must not put himself in a position where his own interests conflict or are likely to conflict with his duty to his client, quasi-client or potential client.
HK Barristers Bar Code of Conduct para 10.15 strong
A practising barrister must promote and protect fearlessly and by all proper and lawful means the lay client's best interests and do so without regard to his own interests or to any consequences to himself or to any other person (including any professional client or other intermediary or another barrister).

Cases dealing with this duty

Clear

273 decisions · link basis: found breached = a tribunal finding; rule cited = the mapped provision is cited in the decision; text match = high-precision text pattern

  • Darren Paul Kruse
    LPCC-SA lawyer 20 Coromandel Parade, Blackwood SA 5051 2026-04-24 found breached

    Between August 2021 and November 2021, the Practitioner failed to act on client instructions and respond to client correspondence, in breach of the following South Australian Legal Practitioners Conduct Rules: • to act …

    Multiple Disciplinary Action Fine Order to apologise Reprimand View decision
  • Nicholas Devlin
    SDT solicitor 12862/2025 2026-04-20 found breached rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Gboyega Ajibola Okunniga
    SDT solicitor 12754/2025 2026-03-19 found breached

    Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Darren Hanison
    SDT solicitor 12764/2025 2026-03-19 found breached rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct 2011, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2019, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Shafiq-ul Hassan
    SDT solicitor 12567/2024 2026-03-12 found breached

    Breaches, Code of Conduct 2011, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

    Suspend - Fixed Period 1 PDF View decision
  • Anthony James Vincent Kerin
    LPCC-SA lawyer Level 2, 44 Waymouth Street, Adelaide SA 5000 2026-01-29 found breached

    1. Persistent, lengthy and inexplicable delays in providing legal services, in breach of the following South Australian Legal Practitioners Conduct Rules: • to act in the best interest of their client (Rule 4.1.1); • to…

    Multiple Disciplinary Action Order to apologise Other Reprimand Undertake training, education or counselling View decision
  • Shahid Ali
    SDT solicitor 12685/2024 2026-01-06 found breached rule cited

    Breaches, Client Money, Code of Conduct 2011, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2011, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2019, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

    Fine 1 PDF View decision
  • Paul Edmund Levy
    SDT solicitor 12739/2025 2025-12-02 found breached rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct 2011, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

    Fine 1 PDF View decision
  • Daniel Jones
    SDT solicitor 12603/2024 2025-10-09 found breached rule cited

    Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Recklessness, SRA Principles 2019

    Fine 1 PDF View decision
  • Landreth Adonis Daniel
    SDT solicitor 12699/2024 2025-10-06 found breached rule cited

    Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, SRA Principles 2019

    Suspend - Fixed Period 1 PDF View decision
  • Kathryn Poole
    SDT solicitor 12635/2024 2025-10-06 found breached rule cited

    Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Elizabeth Oruene Ikiriko
    SDT solicitor 12696/2024 2025-08-28 found breached rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Recklessness, SRA Principles 2019

    Suspend - Fixed Period 1 PDF View decision
  • Yusuf Jamal Siddiqui
    SDT solicitor 12637/2024 2025-08-22 found breached rule cited

    Breaches, Client Money, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2019, SRA Principles 2019

    Suspend - Fixed Period 1 PDF View decision
  • Simon Plant; Ajaz Ali
    SDT solicitor 12715/2024 2025-08-22 found breached

    Breaches, Code of Conduct 2011, Recklessness, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

    Fine 1 PDF View decision
  • Daniel James Skinner
    SDT solicitor 12636/2024 2025-07-25 found breached rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct 2011, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, Lack of Integrity, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Fasar Mahmood
    SDT solicitor 12687/2024 2025-06-19 found breached rule cited

    Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, Lack of Integrity, Misappropriation of Client Account, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2019, SRA Principles 2011

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Sarah Elizabeth Reynolds
    SDT solicitor 12509/2023 2025-06-19 found breached rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, SRA Principles 2019

    Fine 1 PDF View decision
  • Ahmed Ajina
    SDT solicitor 12666/2024 2025-04-14 found breached rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, Lack of Integrity, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Waheed Ur Rehman Mian
    SDT solicitor 12646/2024 2025-04-14 found breached

    Breaches, Code of Conduct 2011, Failures, SRA Principles 2011

    Suspend - Fixed Period 1 PDF View decision
  • Lynsay Kelly
    SSDT solicitor Lynsay Kelly, 29 St Vincent Crescent, Ayr 2025-04-08 found breached
    strike_off No Appeal 2 PDFs View decision
  • Simon Jonathan Tager
    SDT solicitor 12630/2024 2025-03-14 found breached

    Lack of Integrity, Recklessness, SRA Principles 2011

    Fine 1 PDF View decision
  • John Mark Fitzpatrick
    LPCC-SA lawyer Unit 1, 121 Walkerville Terrace, Walkerville SA 5081 2025-03-07 found breached text match

    Repeated failures and breaches of Rules relating to the conduct of legal practitioners, including, repeated failures to respond in an adequate and timely manner to requests for information from the Commissioner and the …

    Struck off View decision
  • Sverre Nils Aaen (1)
    SSDT solicitor Sverre Nils Aaen, formerly having a place of business at LTO Ltd, 81 St. Vincent Street, Glasgow 2025-02-24 found breached
    reprimand No Appeal 1 PDF View decision
  • Samira Mohamed Seth
    SDT solicitor 12579/2024 2025-02-12 found breached rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Failures, Recklessness, SRA Principles 2019

    Fine 1 PDF View decision
  • Bridget Catherine Miller
    SDT solicitor 12616/2024 2025-02-12 found breached

    Breaches, Code of Conduct 2011, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

    Fine 1 PDF View decision

Duty classification does not yet cover every jurisdiction (Ontario, New Zealand and Singapore decisions are indexed but not yet duty-classified), so counts here understate those corpora.