Skip to main content
discipline 4 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Linda Mary Box

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number11509/2016
Date01/01/2016
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Solicitors' Accounts Rules

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
CostsGBP 6,244
Dishonesty foundYes

Linda Mary Box, Senior Partner at Dixon Coles & Gill, admitted misappropriating £537,650.53 from Mrs MT's probate estate and £625,721.35 from Mrs CC's probate estate for her own benefit and the benefit of others, including settling personal credit card debts and paying a marketing firm connected to her husband's funeral business. The Tribunal found all allegations proved, including express dishonesty (applying the Twinsectra test), noting she used false narratives to conceal payments. Losses ran to millions, with the Compensation Fund and insurers making substantial payments. Finding no exceptional circumstances and citing SRA v Sharma, the Tribunal struck her off the Roll and ordered costs of £6,244.10.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Planned, deliberate, systematic and repeated dishonesty over a long period
  • Breach of trust placed by vulnerable deceased clients and fellow partners
  • Very high value misappropriated (over £1.16 million across two estates)
  • Took advantage of vulnerable people
  • Used false narratives on payment transfer slips to conceal true nature of payments
  • Conduct only came to light through others; she did not stop voluntarily

Mitigating factors:

  • Open and frank admissions and cooperation with the disciplinary process
  • Immediate resignation after being confronted
  • Attempts to make restitution (£94,078.70 repaid and further assets offered)
  • Previously long unblemished record / previous good character
  • Attended the Tribunal to face the consequences
  • Genuine contrition and remorse

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/11509/