Skip to main content
discipline 4 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

PETER BRUCE DE BARRAN CULLEN

JurisdictionAustralia — Western Australia
BodyLegal Practice Board of Western Australia (LPBWA)
Professionlawyer — PO Box 112 FREMANTLE WA 6173
Case numberLegal Practitioners Complaints Committee v Cullen [2005] WASAT 211
Date20 July 2005
HearingState Administrative Tribunal
OutcomeUnprofessional Conduct and Unsatisfactory Conduct by way of Unprofessional Conduct

Allegation / charges

Unprofessional Conduct and Unsatisfactory Conduct by way of Unprofessional Conduct

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionFine
FineAUD 8,000
CostsAUD 2,000
Dishonesty foundNo

Senior WA practitioner Peter Cullen was found guilty of unprofessional conduct (1 Oct 2001-31 Dec 2003) and unsatisfactory conduct by unprofessional conduct (1 Jan-11 May 2004) arising from bank errors depositing trust monies (~$107,980) into his general account on 13 occasions, compounded by auditor and bookkeeper failures, resulting in debit balances in client trust ledgers. There was no allegation or finding of dishonesty; Cullen promptly rectified the deficiency once informed. The Tribunal declined the Committee's request for a two-year suspension, instead imposing a reprimand, an $8000 fine, conditions on practice for two years (daily/weekly/quarterly trust account reconciliation and reporting to the Legal Practice Board), $2000 costs, and publication of the decision.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Previous 1997 finding of unprofessional conduct in relation to operation of his trust account
  • Substantial amount of money involved (approx $107,980.13)
  • Risk to clients' money, with general account overdrawn about $90,000 or more throughout the period
  • Conduct occurred over a substantial 27-month period despite prior further study undertaken

Mitigating factors:

  • No allegation of dishonesty
  • Errors originated with the bank, auditors, and bookkeeper, not the practitioner's fault
  • Early plea and prompt acceptance of responsibility
  • Promptly remedied trust account deficiency once informed (within about a month)
  • Senior practitioner with strong character references attesting to honesty and competence
  • Practitioner was suffering from a liver condition during part of the period

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://www.lpbwa.org.au/getmedia/e88f5464-6f25-45e2-b150-f9c594dd81c1/register_of_disciplinary_action.pdf