Decision record
Ziesolleck, Stefan Arthur
Allegation / charges
1. The Respondent Lawyer failed to inform the Complainant of a (potential) conflict of interest arising in respect of his involvement and handling of the matter. 2. The Respondent Lawyer sent correspondence which exceeded the legitimate assertions and entitlement of himself and his company and which attempted to mislead and intimidate the Complainant. 3. The Respondent Lawyer engaged in discourteous communications with the complainant by being rude, dismissive and inflammatory in his emails to the Complainant — Unsatisfactory Professional Conduct
Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision
The Respondent Lawyer was found to have engaged in unsatisfactory professional conduct for failing to disclose a potential conflict of interest, sending misleading and intimidating correspondence, and communicating discourteously with the complainant. No express finding of dishonesty was made and no sanction is stated in the provided text.
Duties found breached:
⚠ figures not found verbatim in the source were dropped: ["extracted_from_register_summary"]
Duties engaged
Documents
No documents recorded.
Source: https://portal.olsc.nsw.gov.au/dasearchbn/daresultdetail/?id=e4821966-c50c-4791-8127-292110402aaf