Skip to main content
discipline 3 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Ian Muir Jewell

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number9779/2007
Date01/01/2007
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Others

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
CostsGBP 3,162
Dishonesty foundYes

Ian Muir Jewell, a non-practising solicitor admitted in 1965, forged the signature of a third party (Mr C) on a conveyancing transfer document and witnessed that signature himself, to assist his friend Mr G in completing a property transaction. The Tribunal found all allegations substantiated, including an express finding of dishonesty applying the Twinsectra test, concluding a solicitor could not honestly believe he could properly forge a signature even for another's benefit. Taking account of his prior disciplinary history, the Tribunal struck him off the Roll and ordered him to pay agreed costs of £3,161.55.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Prior disciplinary history including 1984 finding of breach of Solicitors Accounts Rules (fined £1,000) and 1996 finding of practising while uncertificated (5 year suspension)
  • Forgery represented misconduct at the most serious end of the scale, damaging the profession's reputation

Mitigating factors:

  • Admissions of facts and allegations (save dishonesty)
  • No personal financial gain or ulterior motive
  • Never attempted to hide the act; witnessed the forged signature with his own name
  • Ill health following serious accident leaving him disabled
  • Positive testimonials attesting to integrity
  • Unreserved apology and remorse

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/9779/