Skip to main content
discipline 4 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Alexander William Bruce Lee

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number12813/2025
Date28/04/2026
OutcomeFine

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Code of Conduct 2011, SRA Principles 2011

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionFine
FineGBP 30,000
CostsGBP 50,000
Dishonesty foundNo

Mr Lee, a partner at Buss Murton Law LLP acting for lender LCF, accepted and continued as sole director and Security Trustee of GST (protecting bondholders' interests) between March 2018 and April 2019. The Tribunal found this created a significant risk of an own-interest conflict contrary to Outcome 3.4, because his fiduciary trustee duties owed to bondholders were structurally opposed to his duties to his client LCF. He took the role 'almost as a favour' to LCF's CEO. The Tribunal found breaches of Outcome 3.4 and Principles 2 (integrity) and 6, holding he should never have accepted the role. No dishonesty was alleged or found; the Tribunal applied the Wingate integrity test (rejecting the argument that bad faith/moral turpitude was required). Fined £30,000 (Band 4) plus £50,000 costs (reduced from £88,254.40).

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Continuation of the conflicted dual roles over an extended period
  • Continuation when clear red flags arose indicating an actual conflict (not merely a risk)
  • Solicitor remained embedded in a conflicted position as matters deteriorated, including during FCA intervention and administration
  • Harm to reputation of the profession was wholly foreseeable
  • Mr Lee knew or ought to have known his conduct materially breached his obligations, having acted against his better judgment

Mitigating factors:

  • Some insight shown into misconduct
  • Full cooperation with the SRA and proceedings
  • Previously unblemished career (admitted NZ 1984, England & Wales 1991)
  • Not a party to or knowing participant in the underlying fraud
  • Delay of 8-9 years in proceedings not attributable to Mr Lee
  • Positive testimonials

Codes & rules applied

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/12813/