Skip to main content
discipline 3 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Lorraine Earle

JurisdictionJamaica
BodyGeneral Legal Council — Disciplinary Committee (GLC)
Professionattorney
Case number66 of 2000
DateMarch 22, 2006
OutcomeStruck off, Restitution Ordered

Allegation / charges

Struck off, Restitution Ordered | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered March 22, 2006. View PDF DECISION OF THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE GENERAL LEGAL COUNCILCOMPLAINT No. 66/2000 BETWEEN VELMA RHODEN THE COMPLAINANT AND LORRAINE A. EARLE THE ATTORNEY PANEL: …

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
CostsJMD 20,000
Dishonesty foundYes

The Complainant paid the Attorney $728,000 in February 1993 to purchase property, but the Attorney failed to pay the vendor and the property was lost. The Panel found beyond reasonable doubt that the Attorney failed to account for and misappropriated the client's funds in breach of Canons VII(b) and I(b). Only $330,000 was repaid, leaving a balance of $398,000. The Attorney was struck off the Roll, ordered to pay restitution of $1,367,162.74 (principal balance plus 12% interest) with continuing interest, and $20,000 costs to the Complainant.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Client paid full purchase price of $700,000 but Attorney failed to pay the vendor, causing loss of the property
  • Attorney used client's money for her own purposes
  • Failure to fully repay despite an agreement to do so; balance of $398,000 outstanding
  • Attorney failed to sign the repayment document, indicating awareness of misappropriation
  • Attorney failed to appear at the hearings despite proper service

Mitigating factors:

  • Partial repayment of $330,000 made between November 2001 and August 2002

Duties engaged

Other decisions involving this respondent

  • 101 of 2003 2009-04-04 · GLC · Jamaica · Struck of f, Restitution Ordered
  • 87 of 2003 2006-05-13 · GLC · Jamaica · Fined, Already Struck off

Matched by respondent name — may include a different person with the same name.

Documents

Source: https://www.generallegalcouncil.org/judgement/lorraine-earle-complaint-no-66-of-2000/