Skip to main content
discipline 3 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Hanif Mohammed

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number11528/2016
Date01/01/2016
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Client Money, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
CostsGBP 55,000
Dishonesty foundYes

Hanif Mohammed, a sole practitioner in Preston, faced allegations arising from 24 improper withdrawals from client account totalling £216,387.30 in 2014, including eight client-to-office transfers of costs where no bills had been rendered. The Tribunal found allegations 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.5 and 1.6 proved, including breaches of the Solicitors Accounts Rules and Principles 2, 6 and 10. It expressly found dishonesty proved in connection with allegation 1.2 (six transfers), applying the Ivey test, concluding he transferred client money to office account without raising bills at a time of HMRC pressure. Allegation 1.4 (fabricating/backdating a bill for Mr D) was found NOT proved, as it could not be established he personally created it, so the associated dishonesty allegation fell away. The hearing was protracted (2017-2019) with numerous adjournments. Finding no exceptional circumstances, the Tribunal struck him off the Roll and ordered costs of £55,000.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Express finding of dishonesty
  • Conduct was deliberate and continued over a period of time
  • Systemic course of conduct rather than a one-off
  • Respondent was COFA and sole signatory, so heightened personal culpability
  • Very experienced solicitor of 26 years
  • Ought reasonably to have known misconduct breached obligations to protect public and profession
  • Self-interest motivation (sole beneficiary of costs taken); risk to substantial client money

Mitigating factors:

  • No previous disciplinary appearances before the Tribunal
  • Serious personal difficulties at the material time (wife's serious ill health, father's serious illness and death)
  • Some making good of the shortages (though not done promptly)

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/11528/