Skip to main content
discipline 4 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Oliver James Saxon

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number12694/2024
Date25/07/2025
OutcomeSuspend - Fixed Period

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Code of Conduct for Firms 2019, Failures, SRA Principles 2019

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionSuspension
Suspension1 months
CostsGBP 4,800
Dishonesty foundNo

Oliver Saxon, a solicitor and sole owner/COLP of Tyto Law Limited, admitted four allegations relating to the employment of Mr Ben Moore, an unadmitted person subject to a S43 order. He failed to conduct due diligence, provided inaccurate information to the SRA in an application form, permitted the Firm to continue employing/remunerating Mr Moore pending approval, and failed to ensure the SRA's conditions were met. The Tribunal found breaches involving lack of integrity but no express finding of dishonesty. Dealt with on the papers by agreed outcome, the Tribunal imposed a one-month suspension commencing 1 August 2025 and ordered costs of £4,800 (inclusive of VAT).

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Allowed a person the SRA had deemed unsuitable for legal practice to work for clients without control before permission was granted
  • Allowed that person to work mostly unsupervised in non-compliance with conditions after approval
  • Allegations included a lack of integrity
  • High level of culpability as experienced solicitor, COLP and sole owner ultimately responsible

Mitigating factors:

  • Full admissions and cooperation with the SRA investigation
  • Misconduct occurred over a limited/short time period
  • No client suffered actual loss; neither the Respondent nor the Firm profited
  • Isolated instance with no prior or subsequent breaches
  • Made an application for approval immediately upon becoming aware of the S43 order

Codes & rules applied

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/12694/