The duty in context
No conflict between current clients client
The lawyer must not act for two or more current clients with conflicting interests except within defined exceptions with each client's informed consent and protection of confidentiality.
How the codes express this duty
E&W Solicitors SRA Principles & Code CCS 6.2 strong 824 cases
6.2 You do not act in relation to a matter or particular aspect of it if you have a conflict of interest or a significant risk of such a conflict in relation to that matter or aspect of it, unless: (a) the clients have a substantially common interest ...; or the clients are competing for the same objective, and the conditions below are met ...
SRA Code of Conduct for Solicitors, RELs and RFLs · 2019 · archived copy · official source ↗
E&W Barristers BSB Handbook rC21.3; gC69 strong 32 cases
rC21.3 there is a conflict of interest, or real risk of conflict of interest, between the prospective client and one or more of your former or existing clients in respect of the particular matter unless all of the clients who have an interest in the particular matter give their informed consent to your acting in such circumstances;
BSB Handbook Part 2: Code of Conduct · 5.0 · archived copy · official source ↗
Cayman Islands Legal Services Code 2026 R.7.1; R.7.2; R.7.3 strong
Except in the limited circumstances dealt with in R.7.3, an attorney-at-law or a recognised law entity shall not act if there is a conflict of interests or a significant risk of a conflict... may act, in non-contentious matters, for more than one client whose interests conflict in the matter only with the informed written consent of all clients.
Cayman Islands Legal Services Code of Professional Conduct · 2026 · archived copy
AU Solicitors Solicitors' Conduct Rules Rules 11.1; 11.2; 11.3; 11.4 strong 134 cases
11.1 A solicitor and a law practice must avoid conflicts between the duties owed to two or more current clients. 11.2 If a solicitor or a law practice seeks to act for two or more clients in the same or related matters where the clients' interests are adverse and there is a conflict or potential conflict... the solicitor or law practice must not act, except where permitted by Rules 11.3 and 11.4.
Australian Solicitors' Conduct Rules · 2015 (June 2026 compilation) · archived copy · official source ↗
AU Barristers Uniform Barristers Rules r113 strong 39 cases
A barrister who is briefed to appear for two or more parties in any case must determine as soon as possible whether the interests of the clients may, as a real possibility, conflict and, if so, the barrister must then return the brief for: (a) all the clients in the case of confidentiality to which Rule 108 would apply; or (b) one or more of the clients so as to remove that possibility of conflict.
Legal Profession Uniform Conduct (Barristers) Rules · 2015 (as amended 14 May 2025) · archived copy · official source ↗
IE Solicitors Law Society Guide Ch3 — General; Conflict of interest between two clients; Non-conveyancing transactions strong 48 cases
A solicitor should not act in a matter, or any part of a matter, where there is a conflict of interest... If a solicitor, acting with ordinary care, would give different advice to different clients about the same matter, there is a conflict of interest, and the solicitor should not act for both clients... Where clients consent to one firm representing both parties to a non-conveyancing transaction, the law requires that each client gives informed consent.
Solicitor's Guide to Professional Conduct (Law Society of Ireland) · 4th ed. (2022) · archived copy · official source ↗
IE Barristers Bar Code of Conduct Rule 3.16; Rule 10.10 partial 48 cases
In cases involving several parties, Barristers on receipt of instructions for more than one of such parties should consider whether or not any conflict arises as between the individual interests of each of the clients and they shall advise the solicitor as to whether any of the clients should be separately advised and represented by a Barrister or solicitor. ... Barristers may appear for more than one defendant in a criminal trial provided they have satisfied themselves that there is no conflict of interest.
Code of Conduct for the Bar of Ireland · 2024 · archived copy · official source ↗
JM Attorneys Canons of Professional Ethics Canon IV(k); Canon IV(l); Canon IV(m) strong 133 cases
Subject to the provisions of Canon IV (l), an Attorney shall not accept or continue his retainer or employment on behalf of two or more clients if their interests are likely to conflict or if the independent professional judgment of the Attorney is likely to be impaired. (l) Notwithstanding the provisions of Canon IV (k), an Attorney may represent multiple clients if he can adequately represent the interests of each and if each consent to such representation after full disclosure of the possible effects of such multiple representation.
Legal Profession (Canons of Professional Ethics) Rules · 1978 (principal) · archived copy · official source ↗
JE Lawyers Law Society of Jersey Code R.6.1; R.6.3 strong
Except in the limited circumstances dealt with in R.6.3, a member or their firm must not act if there is a conflict of interests or a significant risk of a conflict... A member or their firm may act, in non-contentious matters, for more than one client whose interests conflict in the matter only with the informed written consent of all clients.
Law Society of Jersey Code of Conduct · 1 January 2017 · archived copy · official source ↗
ON Lawyers LSO Rules of Prof. Conduct r 3.4-2; r 3.4-3 strong
3.4-2 A lawyer shall not represent a client in a matter when there is a conflict of interest unless there is consent, which must be fully informed and voluntary after disclosure, from all affected clients and the lawyer reasonably believes that he or she is able to represent each client without having a material adverse effect upon the representation of or loyalty to the other client. [3.4-3 Despite rule 3.4-2, a lawyer shall not represent opposing parties in a dispute.]
Law Society of Ontario — Rules of Professional Conduct · current · archived copy · official source ↗
BC Lawyers BC Code r 3.4-2 strong 34 cases
A lawyer must not represent a client in a matter when there is a conflict of interest unless there is express or implied consent from all clients and the lawyer reasonably believes that he or she is able to represent each client without having a material adverse effect upon the representation of or loyalty to the other client.
Code of Professional Conduct for British Columbia (BC Code) · 2017 · archived copy · official source ↗
NZ Lawyers Conduct & Client Care Rules r 6.1 strong
A lawyer must not act for more than 1 client on a matter in any circumstances where there is a more than negligible risk that the lawyer may be unable to discharge the obligations owed to 1 or more of the clients.
Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008 · SR 2008/214 · archived copy · official source ↗
SCO Solicitors LSS Standards of Conduct B1.7 strong 56 cases
You must not act for two or more clients in matters where there is a conflict of interest between the clients or for any client where there is a conflict between the interest of the client and your interest or that of your practice unit.
Law Society of Scotland — Practice Rules 2011, Rule B1 (Standards of Conduct) · 2011 · archived copy · official source ↗
SG Lawyers Professional Conduct Rules 2015 r 20 (Conflict, or potential conflict, between interests of 2 or more clients) strong 13 cases
20 Conflict, or potential conflict, between interests of 2 or more clients
Legal Profession (Professional Conduct) Rules 2015 · 2015 · archived copy · official source ↗
HK Solicitors Solicitors' Guide Principle 9.01 strong
A solicitor or firm of solicitors must not accept instructions to act for two or more clients where there is a conflict or a significant risk of conflict between the interests of those clients.
Hong Kong Solicitors' Guide to Professional Conduct (Volume 1) · current · archived copy · official source ↗
HK Barristers Bar Code of Conduct para 10.14(a) strong
If after he has accepted the brief or instructions on behalf of more than one lay client, there is or appears to be a conflict or a risk of conflict between the interests of any one or more of such clients, he must not continue to act for any client unless all such clients give their consent to his so acting and he can do so without embarrassment.
Code of Conduct of the Bar of the Hong Kong SAR · 2018 · archived copy · official source ↗
Cases dealing with this duty
1,286 decisions · link basis: found breached = a tribunal finding; rule cited = the mapped provision is cited in the decision; text match = high-precision text pattern
-
Bhaskar Subramaniam - J
Breaches, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules
-
Andrew John Field
Breaches, Failures
-
Claudius Roosevelt Challenger
Failures
-
Richard A A Adesakin & Babasoji O Doherty
Breaches, Client Money, Failures, Others, Solicitors' Accounts Rules
-
Mark Kenneth George Bennett - J
Breaches, Failures, Others, Solicitors' Accounts Rules
-
Naweed Riaz & Farhat Hussain
Breaches, Delays, Failures, Others
-
Andre Michael Wormstone
Criminal Convictions
-
Mutalib Kayode Abiodun Michael Adelasoye
Criminal Convictions, Others
-
Kengai Ponnampalam Chetty
Breaches, Client Money, Failures, Others, Solicitors' Accounts Rules
-
Thomas E M McManus & Another
Breaches, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules, Others
-
David Alan Webb
Breaches, Failures, Others
-
Miller, James Mathew
Professional Misconduct 1. Failed to comply with a notice pursuant to Section 660 of the Legal Profession Act 2004 Unsatisfactory Professional Conduct 2. Failed to provide tax invoices to client 3. Received trust money …
-
Laftsidis, Dimitrios
1. Breach of trust account provisions, by withdrawing monies from trust without any authority to do so 2. Breach of trust acocunt provisions, by failing to transfer monies received on trust to a trust account 3. Breach …
-
Brian Christopher M. Wallace
Fined | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered December 04, 2010. View PDF DECISION OF THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE GENERAL LEGAL COUNCILCOMPLAINT No. 13/2002 BETWEEN STANLEY SIMPSON COMPLAINANT AND BRIAN WALLAC…
-
Hussein, Erdem
1. Failure to provide complainant with an account for costs and disbursements 2. Failure to release complainant's file and other papers notwithstanding that his account had been paid in full 3. Delay in providing a cheq…
-
Daniel J Coleman
In the matter of Daniel J Coleman, solicitor, formerly practising as Coleman & Co, Solicitors, Main Street, Ballinrobe, Co Mayo, and in the matter of the Solicitors Acts 1954-2008 [8347/DT20/09 and High Court record no …
strike_off View decision -
Arthur G. Kitchin
Suspended, Restitution Ordered, Fined | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered July 17, 2010. View PDF DECISION OF THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE GENERAL LEGAL COUNCIL Complaint No. 113/2008 IN THE MATTER of a com…
-
Joseph Traynor
In the matter of Joseph Traynor, solicitor, formerly practising as Traynor & Company, Solicitors, 86 Clanbrassil Street, Dundalk, Co Louth, and in the matter of the Solicitors Acts 1954-2008 [5554/DT01/10 and High Court…
strike_off View decision -
-
Michael J Murphy
In the matter of Michael J Murphy, a solicitor formerly practising as MJ Murphy & Co, Solicitors, 25 Lower Salthill, Galway, Co Galway, and in the matter of the Solicitors Acts 1954-2008 [4803/DT119/08 and High Court re…
strike_off View decision -
O'donnell, John Alexander
1. Wilfully breached Sections 255 and 264 of Legal Profession Act 2004 - relating to trust funds 2. Wilfully breached Section 264 of the Legal Profession Act 2004 - handling of trust moneys 3. Misappropriated funds 4. F…
-
PAUL ERNEST MASTEN
Professional Misconduct
-
Carlton H. Campbell
Compensation | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered March 28, 2010. View PDF IN THE MATTER of MILLICENT FORREST v CARLTON CAMPBELL, an Attorney-at-Law AND IN THE MATTER of the Legal Profession Act. Complaint No. 23…
-
Trevor Ruddock
Struck off, Repayment & Restitution Ordered | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered February 13, 2010. View PDF JUDGEMENT OF THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE COMPLAINT NO. 74 OF 2003 BETWEEN JOAN BURKETT POWELL COMPLAINAN…
-
Audley Earl Melhado
Restitution Ordered, Fined | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered January 23, 2010. View PDF DECISION OF THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEEOF THE GENERAL LEGAL COUNCILComplaint No. 168/2007 IN THE MATTER of a complaint by …
Duty classification does not yet cover every jurisdiction (Ontario, New Zealand and Singapore decisions are indexed but not yet duty-classified), so counts here understate those corpora.