Skip to main content
discipline 3 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Omer Mian

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number11919/2019
Date01/01/2019
OutcomeS.43 Order (clerks)

Allegation / charges

Criminal Convictions

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionOther
CostsGBP 4,086
Dishonesty foundNo

The Respondent, an unadmitted legal cashier, was convicted in 2017 of conspiracy to defraud (fraudulent mortgage applications and employment references) and sentenced to 29 months imprisonment. The SRA sought a section 43 order and a financial penalty. The Tribunal found the allegation proved beyond reasonable doubt and granted the section 43 order to protect the public, but declined to impose a fine because the criminal conduct was unconnected to his work at the firm, caused no client detriment, and a custodial sentence had already been served. The Respondent was ordered to pay costs of £4,086.37. No express finding of dishonesty was made by the Tribunal itself.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Serious criminal offence reflected in 29-month custodial sentence
  • Directly involved in providing fraudulent employment references and certifying mortgage applications for individuals he had never met

Mitigating factors:

  • Criminal activity was unconnected to his work in the legal practice
  • No detriment to clients of the firm
  • Had already served a significant custodial sentence
  • Pleaded guilty in Crown Court and did not oppose the section 43 order

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/11919/