C H M Robson & Another
Allegation / charges
Breaches, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules, Others
Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision
Two solicitors of White Rose Solicitors faced disciplinary charges arising from an employee bookkeeper's theft of ~£935,000 from client account, accounts rules breaches, failure to deliver accountant's reports, and a breached undertaking. The Tribunal found the First Respondent (Robson) acted dishonestly by deliberately breaching an undertaking to Preferred Mortgages Ltd and diverting a £191,875 mortgage advance to a third party in return for a £10,000 fee, resulting in client loss. Applying Twinsectra and Bolton, with no exceptional circumstances, he was struck off and ordered to pay £15,521.65 costs. The alleged 'sham partnership' dishonesty against both was found not proved. The Second Respondent admitted numerous accounts/regulatory breaches and was fined £7,500 plus £5,173.88 costs.
Duties found breached:
- No improper communication with the court
- Advise on alternatives, settlement and outcome
- No conflict between current clients
- No improper use of client money
- Accounting records, reconciliation and reports
- Diligence and timeliness
- Supervise staff and delegated work
- Hold a current practising certificate
Aggravating factors:
- Dishonesty was serious, calculated and deliberate (First Respondent)
- First Respondent charged a £10,000 'facilitation' fee to breach undertaking knowing it was wrong
- Client (Preferred Mortgages Ltd) suffered actual loss
- Failure to act against Mr Peach after learning of his prior convictions, enabling a further £37,789.89 theft
Mitigating factors:
- Isolated one-off incident, not repeated
- First Respondent was himself the victim of a fraud and funds were never recovered
- Firm properly closed down without intervention; Respondents acted responsibly
- Positive character references and evidence
- Respondents relatively young with much to offer; financial hardship (IVA, possible bankruptcy)
- First Respondent took a legal charge from Mr Peach to protect client funds
Duties engaged
- No improper communication with the court
- Honesty
- Advise on alternatives, settlement and outcome
- No conflict between current clients
- No improper use of client money
- Accounting records, reconciliation and reports
- Diligence and timeliness
- Maintain competence and CPD
- Supervise staff and delegated work
- Hold a current practising certificate