Skip to main content
discipline 3 October 2026

The duty in context

No bribery or improper gifts integrity

The lawyer must ensure any gift or benefit complies with bribery, corruption and gift rules and must not give anything of value to a judge, juror or tribunal official in a pending matter.

917 cases 74% strike-off 1 with dishonesty finding

How the codes express this duty

E&W Solicitors SRA Principles & Code CCS 2.3; Principle 2 partial 900 cases
2.3 You do not provide or offer to provide any benefit to witnesses dependent upon the nature of their evidence or the outcome of the case. 1.2 in a way that upholds public trust and confidence in the solicitors' profession and in legal services provided by authorised persons.
E&W Barristers BSB Handbook gC18; gC19; gC30.2 partial 1 case
gC18 The following may reasonably be seen as compromising your independence in breach of Rule 8 ... .1 offering, promising or giving: .a any commission or referral fee ... or .b a gift (apart from items of modest value), to any client, professional client or other intermediary; gC30 ... .2 whether in a private or publicly funded case, a referral fee to which the client has not consented may constitute a bribe and therefore a criminal offence under the Bribery Act 2010;
Cayman Islands Legal Services Code 2026 R.7.9; R.10.1 strong
An attorney-at-law shall ensure that any gratuitous benefit received from a client, whether monetary or non-monetary, is compliant with applicable legislation on bribery and corruption, and any other regulation applicable to attorneys-at-law and recognised law entities in respect of gifts.
AU Solicitors Solicitors' Conduct Rules no clear equivalent
AU Barristers Uniform Barristers Rules r45 partial 7 cases
A barrister may not give a commission or gift to any person by reason of or in connection with the introduction of professional work by that person to the barrister.
IE Solicitors Law Society Guide Ch3 — Prohibition on payments to clients; Ch6 — Inducements partial
A solicitor should not, directly, or indirectly, make or offer to make any payment to or on behalf of any person as an inducement to obtain or retain instructions... A solicitor must not encourage or offer inducements to any third party with a view to obtaining instructions from any person.
IE Barristers Bar Code of Conduct no clear equivalent
JM Attorneys Canons of Professional Ethics Canon V(h) strong
An Attorney shall not give, lend or promise anything of value to a Judge, juror or official of a tribunal before which there is a pending matter in which he is engaged.
JE Lawyers Law Society of Jersey Code R.6.9 partial
This Rule applies alongside, and is without prejudice to, applicable legislation on bribery and corruption, and the requirement on a firm to keep a register of gifts.
ON Lawyers LSO Rules of Prof. Conduct r 5.1-2(d) partial
When acting as an advocate, a lawyer shall not ... endeavour or allow anyone else to endeavour, directly or indirectly, to influence the decision or action of a tribunal or any of its officials in any case or matter by any means other than open persuasion as an advocate
BC Lawyers BC Code r 5.1-2(d) partial 1 case
When acting as an advocate, a lawyer must not: ... (d) endeavour or allow anyone else to endeavour, directly or indirectly, to influence the decision or action of a tribunal or any of its officials in any case or matter by any means other than open persuasion as an advocate;
NZ Lawyers Conduct & Client Care Rules r 5.9 partial
A lawyer must not directly or indirectly offer to, or receive from, a third party any reward or inducement in respect of any advice given, referrals made, products or services purchased, or any work done for a client.
SCO Solicitors LSS Standards of Conduct no clear equivalent
SG Lawyers Professional Conduct Rules 2015 no clear equivalent
HK Solicitors Solicitors' Guide no clear equivalent
HK Barristers Bar Code of Conduct para 10.10 partial
A practising barrister must not give a commission or present or make any payment (other than a payment for practice promotion permitted by this Code) to any person for the purposes of procuring professional instructions or rewarding the giving or introduction of professional instructions.

Cases dealing with this duty

Clear

917 decisions · link basis: found breached = a tribunal finding; rule cited = the mapped provision is cited in the decision; text match = high-precision text pattern

  • Dentons UK and Middle East LLP
    SDT solicitor 12476/2023 2024-06-21 text match

    Breaches, Code of Conduct 2011, Money Laundering Regulations, SRA Principles 2011

    Allegations not substantiated 1 PDF View decision
  • Jasvinder Singh Gill
    SDT solicitor 12519/2023 2024-06-13 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct 2011, SRA Principles 2011

    Suspend - Fixed Period 1 PDF View decision
  • Danielle De Carpentier
    SDT solicitor 12564/2024 2024-05-30 rule cited

    Criminal Convictions, Dishonesty, Lack of Integrity, SRA Principles 2011

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Sunny Sidhu
    SDT solicitor 12523/2023 2024-05-30 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, Lack of Integrity, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Richard Gregory Barca
    SDT solicitor 12486/2023 2024-05-09 rule cited

    Code of Conduct 2011, SRA Principles 2011

    Fine 1 PDF View decision
  • Pravin Jugdaohsingh
    SDT solicitor 12506/2023 2024-05-09 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, Lack of Integrity, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Paulina Marianna Jastrzebska
    SDT solicitor 12550/2024 2024-05-09 rule cited

    Breaches, Criminal Convictions, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Nicholas Giles Collins
    SDT solicitor 12565/2024 2024-05-01 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct 2007, Code of Conduct 2011, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Kerry Ann Stevens
    SDT solicitor 12512/2023 2024-05-01 rule cited

    Criminal Convictions, Dishonesty, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Jassen Venkatasamy
    SDT solicitor 12507/2023 2024-05-01 rule cited

    Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, SRA Principles 2019

    Allegations not substantiated 1 PDF View decision
  • Philip John Burbidge
    SDT solicitor 12505/2023 2024-04-16 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct 2011, Dishonesty, Lack of Integrity, SRA Principles 2011

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Farrukh Najeeb Husain
    SDT solicitor 12463/2023 2024-04-04 rule cited

    Breaches, Lack of Integrity, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Mohammed Ekramul Hoque Mazumder; Naser Khan; Salauddin Khan
    SDT solicitor 12455/2023 2024-04-02 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct 2011, Dishonesty, Lack of Integrity, SRA Principles 2011

    Fine, No Order, Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Michael John Little
    SDT solicitor 12498/2023 2024-04-02 rule cited

    Code of Conduct 2007, Code of Conduct 2011, Criminal Convictions, Dishonesty, Lack of Integrity, SRA Principles 2011

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Lawson Akhigbe
    SDT solicitor 12451/2023 2024-04-02 rule cited

    Code of Conduct 2011, Dishonesty, Failures, Lack of Integrity, Practice Framework Rules, SRA Principles 2011

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Amjad Elias Salfiti, Martina Jovovic
    SDT solicitor 12497/2023 2024-04-02 rule cited
    No Order 1 PDF View decision
  • (unnamed)
    SDT solicitor 12508/2023 2024-03-22 rule cited
    Restoration to the Roll - Refused 1 PDF View decision
  • Rajinder Heer
    SDT solicitor 12499/2023 2024-03-15 rule cited

    Code of Conduct 2011, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2011, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2019, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Matthew Nester
    SDT solicitor 12495/2023 2024-03-15 rule cited

    Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, Lack of Integrity, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Frederick William Adams
    SDT solicitor 12490/2023 2024-03-15 rule cited

    Code of Conduct for Firms 2019, Lack of Integrity, SRA Principles 2019

    Suspend - Fixed Period 1 PDF View decision
  • Krystel Marzan
    SDT solicitor 12480/2023 2024-02-23 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Amanda Marie Lennon
    SDT solicitor 12541/2024 2024-02-23 rule cited

    Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, Lack of Integrity, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Michael Lennon
    SDT solicitor 12513/2023 2024-02-23 rule cited

    Client Money, Dishonesty, Lack of Integrity, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2011, SRA Principles 2011

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Paul Fraser Langley
    SDT solicitor 12494/2023 2024-02-23 rule cited

    Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Lack of Integrity, SRA Principles 2019

    Suspend - Fixed Period 1 PDF View decision
  • Jack Grunhut
    SDT solicitor 12488/2023 2024-01-26 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct 2011, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, Lack of Integrity, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision

Duty classification does not yet cover every jurisdiction (Ontario, New Zealand and Singapore decisions are indexed but not yet duty-classified), so counts here understate those corpora.