Skip to main content
discipline 4 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Takeshige Sugimoto

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number12554/2024
Date02/10/2024
OutcomeS.43 Order (clerks)

Allegation / charges

Breaches, SRA Overseas Principles

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionOther
CostsGBP 36,000
Dishonesty foundNo

Takeshige Sugimoto, an unadmitted Registered Foreign Lawyer and partner at Bird & Bird's Brussels branch, pursued a two-month course of inappropriate, sexually motivated conduct towards a junior legal consultant (Person B) who reported directly to him, including hundreds of personal/intimate WhatsApp messages, repeated declarations of feelings, waiting outside her home, and unwanted physical contact (taking her hand and hugging). The Tribunal found Allegations 1.2 and 2 proved on an agreed outcome basis, finding breaches of Overseas Principles 2 and 6, that the conduct was sexually motivated and an abuse of position. No dishonesty was alleged or found (lack of integrity only). The Tribunal imposed a Section 43 order for 5 years and ordered costs of £36,000 (inclusive of VAT, with a VAT refund provision).

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Misconduct was repeated
  • Misconduct persisted over a period of two months
  • Amounted to an abuse of power and position of authority
  • Included a sexual element in view of the sexual motivation
  • High culpability - experienced lawyer and partner who exploited an imbalance of power over a junior female consultant

Mitigating factors:

  • Respondent's own (non-agreed) mitigation: acting during a time of personal crisis following the death of his father and separation from family, suffering depression
  • He believed the relationship was consensual and ceased his conduct once he understood there was no chance of a relationship, taking no retaliation
  • Had not worked for an SRA-regulated firm since 23 July 2019 and had not been an RFL since 31 October 2019
  • Made admissions to resolve the matter by agreed outcome

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/12554/