Skip to main content
discipline 4 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

P J Warner

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number10297
Date01/01/1970
OutcomeS.43 Order (clerks)

Allegation / charges

Others

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionFine
FineGBP 8,000
CostsGBP 30,000
Dishonesty foundNo

Two solicitor partners admitted failing to notify lenders of material facts, failing to act in mortgagee clients' best interests, and failing to supervise staff and a struck-off solicitor (Osili) who continued to operate in the firm's name. The Tribunal found these failures allowed clear mortgage fraud to occur. Each solicitor was fined £8,000 and ordered to pay £12,000 costs each. The third respondent, an unadmitted conveyancing clerk, was found to have backdated letters to mislead the FIO and repeatedly changed her account; she was made subject to a Section 43 order and ordered to pay £6,000 costs. Total costs assessed at £30,000. No express finding of dishonesty was recorded.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Failure to supervise permitted clear mortgage fraud to take place which might give rise to serious losses for lender clients
  • Mortgage fraud was a well appreciated risk at the time
  • Failure to notify mortgagee clients of unusual circumstances
  • Warner backdated letters and provided them to the FIO intending to mislead, and repeatedly shifted her account, misleading the SRA

Mitigating factors:

  • First and Second Respondents had no previous disciplinary record and provided strong character references
  • They were not conveyancers and had been naive, taken in by struck-off solicitor Osili who concealed his practising conditions and impending strike-off
  • They did not benefit financially from Osili's continued involvement
  • They relocated offices and reported Osili to the police; subsequent SRA inspection (as Henshaw Solicitors) found no concerns
  • Tribunal satisfied neither solicitor was a danger to the public; genuine remorse and shame expressed

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/10297-10479/