§ discipline
‹ Browse decisions

J Kowalik

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number9789/2007
Date01/01/2007
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules, Others

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
Dishonesty foundYes

Julian Roger Victor Kowalik, a solicitor admitted in 1992 practising as Seakens Solicitors, faced numerous allegations of misconduct including failing to disclose substantial discounts to lender clients, inadequate supervision (allowing a s.43-barred individual to conduct immigration work), misusing his client account in a property investment scheme that caused retired clients to lose £41,875, charging fees for no legal work, practising in breach of practising certificate conditions, improperly withdrawing client money to his personal/office accounts, failing to rectify accounts errors, writing a misleading letter to Eversheds, and facilitating suspicious conveyancing transactions with mortgage fraud features. The Respondent did not attend. The Tribunal found all allegations substantiated and made express findings of dishonesty applying the Twinsectra test on all dishonesty allegations except the misleading letter to Eversheds (allegation (i)), where it accepted the letter was a 'stalling tactic' without dishonest intent. He was struck off the Roll and ordered to pay costs subject to detailed assessment.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Previous appearance before the Tribunal in 2003 (reprimanded for accounts rule breaches)
  • Multiple findings of dishonesty
  • Vulnerable retired clients (Mr and Mrs Stallard, aged 66) lost their money (£41,875)
  • Conduct facilitated potential mortgage fraud
  • Misleading client ledger entries created to hide a second mortgage advance
  • Significant cash shortage on client account (minimum £35,106.12)

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/9789/