No baseless or threatened misconduct report profession
The lawyer must not make or threaten a professional-misconduct allegation or report without a genuine, reasonably held and bona fide belief that it applies.
How the codes express this duty
E&W Solicitors SRA Principles & Code no clear equivalent
E&W Barristers BSB Handbook rC67 strong 50 cases
rC67 You must never make, or threaten to make, a report under Rule rC66 without a genuine and reasonably held belief that Rule rC66 applies.
BSB Handbook · current · archived copy · official source ↗
Cayman Islands Legal Services Code 2026 no clear equivalent
AU Solicitors Solicitors' Conduct Rules Rule 32.1 strong 7 cases
A solicitor must not make an allegation against another Australian legal practitioner of unsatisfactory professional conduct or professional misconduct unless the allegation is made bona fide and the solicitor believes on reasonable grounds that available material by which the allegation could be supported provides a proper basis for it.
Australian Solicitors' Conduct Rules · 2015 (June 2026 compilation) · archived copy · official source ↗
AU Barristers Uniform Barristers Rules no clear equivalent
IE Solicitors Law Society Guide no clear equivalent
IE Barristers Bar Code of Conduct no clear equivalent
JM Attorneys Canons of Professional Ethics no clear equivalent
JE Lawyers Law Society of Jersey Code no clear equivalent
ON Lawyers LSO Rules of Prof. Conduct r 3.2-5(b); r 7.1-3 commentary [1] partial
3.2-5 A lawyer shall not, in an attempt to gain a benefit for a client, threaten, or advise a client to threaten, without reasonable and lawful justification ... (b) to make a complaint to a regulatory authority. [7.1-3 commentary [1]: In all cases, the report must be made without malice or ulterior motive. 3.2-5 commentary [1]: It is an abuse of the process of a court or, ordinarily, a regulatory authority to threaten to make or advance a charge or complaint in order to secure the satisfaction of a private grievance.]
Law Society of Ontario — Rules of Professional Conduct · current · archived copy · official source ↗
BC Lawyers BC Code r 7.1-3, commentary [2] partial 41 cases
Nothing in this paragraph is meant to interfere with the lawyer-client relationship. In all cases, the report must be made without malice or ulterior motive.
Code of Professional Conduct for British Columbia (BC Code) · 2017 · archived copy · official source ↗
NZ Lawyers Conduct & Client Care Rules r 2.10 strong
A lawyer must not use, or threaten to use, the complaints or disciplinary process for an improper purpose.
Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008 · SR 2008/214 · archived copy · official source ↗
SCO Solicitors LSS Standards of Conduct no clear equivalent
SG Lawyers Professional Conduct Rules 2015 r 29 (Allegations against another legal practitioner) partial
29 Allegations against another legal practitioner
Legal Profession (Professional Conduct) Rules 2015 · 2015 · archived copy · official source ↗
HK Solicitors Solicitors' Guide no clear equivalent
HK Barristers Bar Code of Conduct para 10.50 partial
A practising barrister shall not make any allegation of misconduct or dishonesty against another barrister unless such allegation is supported by reasonably credible evidence.
Code of Conduct of the Bar of the Hong Kong SAR · 2018 · archived copy · official source ↗
Cases dealing with this duty
41 decisions · link basis: found breached = a tribunal finding; rule cited = the mapped provision is cited in the decision; text match = high-precision text pattern
-
Kin Ip Lo
Rule 3-7.1 Consent Agreement
Rule 3-7.1 Consent Agreement 1 PDF -
Michael Andrew Christ
Rule 3-7.1 Consent Agreement
Rule 3-7.1 Consent Agreement 1 PDF -
Naeem-ul-Nushad Ahmed
Rule 3-7.1 Consent Agreement
Rule 3-7.1 Consent Agreement 1 PDF -
Manjit Singh Walia
Rule 3-7.1 Consent Agreement
Rule 3-7.1 Consent Agreement 1 PDF -
Stuart Jay Zukerman
Rule 3-7.1 Consent Agreement
Rule 3-7.1 Consent Agreement 1 PDF -
James Wayne Rowe
Rule 3-7.1 Consent Agreement
Rule 3-7.1 Consent Agreement 1 PDF -
Mary Ellen Turpel-Lafond
Rule 3-7.1 Consent Agreement
Rule 3-7.1 Consent Agreement 1 PDF -
Michael Shane Dugas
Rule 3-7.1 Consent Agreement
Rule 3-7.1 Consent Agreement 1 PDF -
Russell Sean McDonough
Rule 3-7.1 Consent Agreement
Rule 3-7.1 Consent Agreement 1 PDF -
Joanna Mun-Ling Lee
Rule 3-7.1 Consent Agreement
Rule 3-7.1 Consent Agreement 1 PDF -
Paul Christopher Doroshenko
Rule 3-7.1 Consent Agreement
Rule 3-7.1 Consent Agreement 1 PDF -
Liam Prakash Kearns
Rule 3-7.1 Consent Agreement
Rule 3-7.1 Consent Agreement 1 PDF -
Kashif Aleemuddin Ahmed
Rule 3-7.1 Consent Agreement
Rule 3-7.1 Consent Agreement 1 PDF -
Chilwin Chienhan Cheng
Rule 3-7.1 Consent Agreement
Rule 3-7.1 Consent Agreement 1 PDF -
Simon Pak Hei Lin
Rule 3-7.1 Consent Agreement
Rule 3-7.1 Consent Agreement 1 PDF -
David Yu-Hsiang Chen
Rule 3-7.1 Consent Agreement
Rule 3-7.1 Consent Agreement 1 PDF -
Rosario Cateno Di Bella
Rule 4-29 Admission of Misconduct and Undertaking to the Discipline Committee
Rule 4-29 Admission of Misconduct and Undertaking to the Discipline Committee 1 PDF -
Katrina Sriranpong
Rule 3-7.1 Consent Agreement | Summary
Rule 3-7.1 Consent Agreement | Summary 1 PDF -
Amarjit Singh Dhindsa
Rule 4-29 Admission of Misconduct and Undertaking to the Discipline Committee
Rule 4-29 Admission of Misconduct and Undertaking to the Discipline Committee 1 PDF -
Robert Glen Orris
Rule 3-7.1 Consent Agreement | Summary
Rule 3-7.1 Consent Agreement | Summary 1 PDF -
George Roland Holland
Rule 3-7.1 Consent Agreement | Summary
Rule 3-7.1 Consent Agreement | Summary 1 PDF -
Paul Christopher Doroshenko
Rule 3-7.1 Consent Agreement | Summary
Rule 3-7.1 Consent Agreement | Summary 1 PDF -
Sonia Sukhdeesh Hayer
Rule 3-7.1 Consent Agreement | Summary
Rule 3-7.1 Consent Agreement | Summary 1 PDF -
David Allen Kidd
Rule 4-29 Admission of Misconduct and Undertaking to Discipline Committee | Summary
Rule 4-29 Admission of Misconduct and Undertaking to Discipline Committee | Summary 1 PDF -
Konrad Malik
Rule 4-29 Admission of Conduct and Undertaking to Discipline Committee | Summary
Rule 4-29 Admission of Conduct and Undertaking to Discipline Committee | Summary 1 PDF
Duty classification does not yet cover every jurisdiction (Ontario, New Zealand and Singapore decisions are indexed but not yet duty-classified), so counts here understate those corpora.